Juckett Lisa A, Bernard Kimberly P, Clark Melissa A, Gadbois Emily A, Wright Bernadette, Thomas Kali S
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Occupational Therapy, The Ohio State University, 453 West 10 th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 14;6(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00728-7.
The rapid growth of the aging population underscores the need for programs tailored to older adults' complex health needs. Home-delivered meal programs are critical, providing nutrition and socialization support to older adults with greatest economic and social need. However, variations in local implementation complicate our understanding of how specific program practices influence older adult outcomes. This present study applies the core functions and forms framework to identify and prioritize essential home-delivered meal practices-or forms-that can be replicated by other meal programs.
This study was conducted within a pragmatic randomized effectiveness trial comparing two home-delivered meal models and their impacts on health outcomes among older adults. The study involved nine meal programs across the United States and used a three-phase approach characterized by the following: (1) core functions of home-delivered meal programs were identified based on Title III of the Older Americans Act; (2) the full spectrum of program "forms" was gathered through site visits, surveys, and listening sessions; and (3) a modified e-Delphi process was conducted with stakeholders to determine consensus on the most essential forms of home-delivered meal programming.
Three core functions were identified from Title III of the Older Americans Act: provide meals to reduce hunger and malnutrition, provide opportunities for socialization, and provide opportunities to promote health and well-being. Out of 103 identified program forms, 25 were deemed essential for achieving the core functions of home-delivered meal programs. Essential practices included dietary customization, emergency meal provision, and meaningful client-driver interactions, as examples.
This study demonstrates that while program variability allows flexibility to meet local client needs, establishing core functions and essential forms provides a foundation for evaluating home-delivered meal program effectiveness. The findings inform home-delivered meal program improvements at the national level, emphasizing a balance between standardized practices and local adaptations. This work serves as a model for characterizing complex interventions in community-based settings, advancing the science of implementation and the impact of home-delivered meals on older adult populations.
NCT registration: NCT05357261 ; April 27, 2022.
老年人口的快速增长凸显了针对老年人复杂健康需求制定相关项目的必要性。上门送餐项目至关重要,它为经济和社会需求最为迫切的老年人提供营养和社交支持。然而,各地实施情况的差异使得我们难以理解特定的项目实践是如何影响老年人的相关结果的。本研究运用核心功能与形式框架来识别并优先确定基本的上门送餐实践——即形式——以便其他送餐项目能够效仿。
本研究是在一项实用随机有效性试验中进行的,该试验比较了两种上门送餐模式及其对老年人健康结果的影响。该研究涉及美国各地的九个送餐项目,并采用了三个阶段的方法,具体如下:(1) 根据《美国老年人法案》第三章确定上门送餐项目的核心功能;(2) 通过实地考察、调查和听证会收集项目“形式”的全貌;(3) 与利益相关者进行改良的电子德尔菲法流程,以确定上门送餐项目最基本形式的共识。
从《美国老年人法案》第三章中确定了三项核心功能:提供膳食以减少饥饿和营养不良、提供社交机会以及提供促进健康和福祉的机会。在确定的103种项目形式中,25种被认为对实现上门送餐项目的核心功能至关重要。基本实践包括饮食定制、应急膳食供应以及有意义的以客户为导向的互动等。
本研究表明,虽然项目的多样性允许灵活满足当地客户的需求,但确立核心功能和基本形式为评估上门送餐项目的有效性提供了基础。这些发现为国家层面上门送餐项目的改进提供了参考,强调了标准化实践与地方适应性之间的平衡。这项工作为描述基于社区环境的复杂干预措施提供了一个模型,推动了实施科学以及上门送餐对老年人群体影响的研究。
美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册中心:NCT05357261;2022年4月