Hayes R B, Raatgever J W, de Bruyn A, Gerin M
Int J Cancer. 1986 Apr 15;37(4):487-92. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910370403.
This case-control study of nasal and paranasal sinus tumors, in males diagnosed between 1978 and 1981 in the Netherlands, was designed to identify environmental risk factors. Special attention was given to assessing any association between nasal cancer and an occupational history of possible formaldehyde exposure while taking into account histologic type of tumor, history of tobacco use, and occupational exposure to wood dust. Of the 116 cases and 259 controls identified, interviews were completed for 91 (78%) of the cases and 195 (75%) of the controls. Adenocarcinoma was strongly associated with a history of high wood dust exposure (RR = 27.0). Two independent assessments of the association between possible formaldehyde exposure and the risk for nasal cancer were carried out (Assessments A and B). By Assessment A the relative risk for nasal cancer associated with possible formaldehyde exposure was 2.5 and by Assessment B it was 1.9. The risk appeared to be most strongly associated with squamous-cell carcinoma and could not be attributed to differences between cases and controls in age, smoking habits, or wood dust exposure. By its retrospective nature, the classification of formaldehyde exposure in this study is not based on known exposures to formaldehyde but on assessment of employment in jobs where formaldehyde exposure is thought possible. Given the limitations of the study, the authors do not consider that it provides conclusive evidence of a carcinogenic effect for formaldehyde, but that it indicates a need for further research--particularly into formaldehyde and squamous carcinoma of the nose.
这项病例对照研究针对1978年至1981年间在荷兰被诊断出的男性鼻及鼻窦肿瘤患者,旨在确定环境风险因素。研究特别关注评估鼻癌与可能接触甲醛的职业史之间的任何关联,同时考虑肿瘤的组织学类型、吸烟史以及职业性接触木尘的情况。在确定的116例病例和259例对照中,完成了对91例(78%)病例和195例(75%)对照的访谈。腺癌与高木尘接触史密切相关(相对危险度=27.0)。对可能接触甲醛与鼻癌风险之间的关联进行了两项独立评估(评估A和评估B)。通过评估A,与可能接触甲醛相关的鼻癌相对危险度为2.5,通过评估B为1.9。该风险似乎与鳞状细胞癌关联最为强烈,且不能归因于病例与对照在年龄、吸烟习惯或木尘接触方面的差异。由于本研究具有回顾性,甲醛接触的分类并非基于已知的甲醛接触情况,而是基于对可能接触甲醛的工作岗位就业情况的评估。鉴于该研究的局限性,作者认为它并未提供甲醛致癌作用的确凿证据,但表明有必要进行进一步研究——尤其是针对甲醛与鼻鳞状细胞癌的研究。