Mazidi Mohsen, Wright Neil, Yao Pang, Kartsonaki Christiana, Millwood Iona Y, Fry Hannah, Said Saredo, Pozarickij Alfred, Pei Pei, Chen Yiping, Wang Baihan, Avery Daniel, Du Huaidong, Schmidt Dan Valle, Yang Ling, Lv Jun, Yu Canqing, Sun DianJianYi, Chen Junshi, Hill Michael, Peto Richard, Collins Rory, Bennett Derrick A, Walters Robin G, Li Liming, Clarke Robert, Chen Zhengming
Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;39(11):1229-1240. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01168-8. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
Plasma proteomics could enhance risk prediction for multiple diseases beyond conventional risk factors or polygenic scores (PS). To assess utility of proteomics for risk prediction of ischemic heart disease (IHD) compared with conventional risk factors and PS in Chinese and European populations. A nested case-cohort study measured plasma levels of 2923 proteins using Olink Explore panel in ~ 4000 Chinese adults (1976 incident IHD cases and 2001 sub-cohort controls). We used conventional and machine learning (Boruta) methods to develop proteomics-based prediction models of IHD, with discrimination assessed using area under the curve (AUC), C-statistics and net reclassification index (NRI). These were compared with conventional risk factors and PS in Chinese and in 37,187 Europeans. Overall, 446 proteins were associated with IHD (false discovery rate < 0.05) in Chinese after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors. Proteomic risk models alone yielded higher C-statistics for IHD than conventional risk factors or PS (0.855 [95%CI 0.841-0.868] vs. 0.845 [0.829-0.860] vs 0.553 [0.528-0.578], respectively). Addition of 446 proteins to PS improved C-statistics to 0.857 (0.843-0.871) and NRI by 109.1%; and addition to conventional risk factors improved C-statistics to 0.868 (0.854-0.882) and NRI by 86.9%. Boruta analysis identified 30 proteins accounting for ~ 90% of improvement in NRI for IHD conferred by all 2923 proteins. Similar proteomic panels yielded comparable improvements in risk prediction of IHD in Europeans. Plasma proteomics improved risk prediction of IHD beyond conventional risk factors and PS and could enhance precision medicine approaches for primary prevention of IHD.
血浆蛋白质组学能够在传统风险因素或多基因评分(PS)之外,增强对多种疾病的风险预测能力。为了评估蛋白质组学在中国和欧洲人群中对缺血性心脏病(IHD)风险预测的效用,并与传统风险因素和PS进行比较。一项巢式病例对照研究使用Olink Explore检测板,对约4000名中国成年人(1976例IHD发病病例和2001名队列对照)的2923种蛋白质的血浆水平进行了测量。我们使用传统方法和机器学习(Boruta)方法,开发基于蛋白质组学的IHD预测模型,并使用曲线下面积(AUC)、C统计量和净重新分类指数(NRI)评估其区分能力。将这些结果与中国人群以及37187名欧洲人群中的传统风险因素和PS进行比较。总体而言,在中国人群中,在对传统心血管疾病风险因素进行调整后,有446种蛋白质与IHD相关(错误发现率<0.05)。仅蛋白质组学风险模型对IHD的C统计量就高于传统风险因素或PS(分别为0.855[95%CI 0.841-0.868]、0.845[0.829-0.860]和0.553[0.528-0.578])。将446种蛋白质添加到PS中可将C统计量提高到0.857(0.843-0.871),NRI提高109.1%;添加到传统风险因素中可将C统计量提高到0.868(0.854-0.882),NRI提高86.9%。Boruta分析确定了30种蛋白质,它们占所有2923种蛋白质赋予IHD的NRI改善的约90%。类似的蛋白质组检测板在欧洲人群中对IHD风险预测也产生了相当的改善。血浆蛋白质组学在传统风险因素和PS之外改善了IHD的风险预测,并可增强IHD一级预防的精准医学方法。