Nestor Paul G, Woodhull Ashley-Ann
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Laboratory of Neuroscience, Harvard Medical School, Brockton, MA, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024 Nov;46(9):811-827. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2024.2428728. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
We investigated the roles of group ethnicity and display rules of emotions in the neuropsychology of social cognition in Asian American and White participants recruited from a majority-minority college campus.
128 participants (mean age = 24.9 years) completed: 1) Advanced Clinical Solutions-Social Perception (ACS-SP), which includes separate measures of affect naming of facial expressions and emotional prosody interpretation of audio statements; 2) Display Rule Assessment Inventory (DRAI), a self-report measure of emotional expressivity across four settings (family, close friends, colleagues, and strangers) and in two distinct domains (should/actual) that asks participants what they believe people should do (social value) and what they would actually do (behavioral self-report).
ACS-SP revealed evidence of cultural bias, as reflected by group ethnicity differences, for recognition of emotional prosody but not emotional facial expressions for Asian American versus White participants. The DRAI showed significant cultural differences only for family relationships with White participants endorsing stronger belief in the social value of expressing negative emotions of sadness, aversion, and fear. These AC-SP and DRAI group differences remained significant when covarying for spoken English language, as measured by an oral word reading test. Hierarchical regression results indicated that group ethnicity and family display rules each made specific and significant contributions to neuropsychological performance but did so in very different and distinct ways. Group ethnicity exerted its greatest effect on prosody interpretation whereas family display rules had its most pronounced influence on affect naming.
The current results may help inform and advance culturally responsive neuropsychological models of social cognition.
我们研究了群体种族和情绪表达规则在从一所少数族裔占多数的大学校园中招募的亚裔美国人和白人参与者的社会认知神经心理学中的作用。
128名参与者(平均年龄 = 24.9岁)完成了:1)高级临床解决方案 - 社会感知(ACS - SP),其中包括对面部表情的情感命名和对音频陈述的情感韵律解释的单独测量;2)表达规则评估量表(DRAI),这是一种自我报告测量工具,用于评估在四种情境(家庭、亲密朋友、同事和陌生人)以及两个不同领域(应该/实际)中的情绪表达能力,该量表询问参与者他们认为人们应该做什么(社会价值观)以及他们实际会做什么(行为自我报告)。
ACS - SP揭示了文化偏见的证据,表现为亚裔美国人和白人参与者在识别情感韵律而非面部表情方面存在群体种族差异。DRAI仅在家庭关系方面显示出显著的文化差异,白人参与者更强烈地相信表达悲伤、厌恶和恐惧等负面情绪的社会价值。当通过口语单词阅读测试测量英语口语时,这些AC - SP和DRAI的群体差异在控制了英语口语后仍然显著。层次回归结果表明,群体种族和家庭表达规则各自对神经心理表现做出了特定且显著的贡献,但方式非常不同且独特。群体种族对韵律解释的影响最大,而家庭表达规则对情感命名的影响最为明显。
当前结果可能有助于为具有文化适应性的社会认知神经心理学模型提供信息并推动其发展。