• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于人们对大脑健康了解程度的系统综述。

Systematic review of what people know about brain health.

作者信息

Niechcial Malwina A, Elhag Shaimaa M, Potter Lauren M, Dickson Adele, Gow Alan J

机构信息

Centre for Applied Behavioural Sciences, Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

Centre for Applied Behavioural Sciences, Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Ageing Res Rev. 2025 Jan;103:102592. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102592. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102592
PMID:39581353
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As we age our cognitive abilities can change. However, the degree of change experienced is influenced by a range of factors. To understand what the public know about risk and protective factors for cognitive ageing, a systematic review was conducted of studies considering what people know about brain health.

METHOD

The search strategy included quantitative and qualitative studies in English, including interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, surveys of beliefs about brain health (including predictions, opinions) in generally healthy adults. PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for published peer-reviewed literature; and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and National Grey Literature Collection, PsycExtra and Google searches for grey literature.

RESULTS

From 37,197 records, one hundred and one were included, comprising 71 quantitative (22 grey literature), 27 qualitative (1 grey literature) and 3 mixed-methods (1 grey literature). Studies were grouped into three themes: Concerns about cognitive ageing, Opportunities to promote brain health and Understanding dementia risk reduction and prevention.

DISCUSSION

Studies reported varying levels of knowledge of brain health, alongside some suggestions for brain health that were somewhat superficial and not always consistent with scientific consensus. There were differences between groups of participants who exhibited less knowledge of brain health, for example, men, older adults, those with lower education and incomes, and ethnic minorities. This review highlights the need for clear messaging around opportunities to promote brain health, including scientifically-endorsed lifestyle factors and more information on the mechanisms by which they operate.

摘要

目标

随着年龄增长,我们的认知能力会发生变化。然而,认知能力变化的程度受一系列因素影响。为了解公众对认知老化的风险因素和保护因素的了解情况,我们对有关人们对大脑健康了解程度的研究进行了系统综述。

方法

检索策略包括英文的定量和定性研究,包括访谈、焦点小组、问卷调查,以及对一般健康成年人关于大脑健康的信念(包括预测、观点)的调查。使用PubMed、PsycINFO、Scopus和科学网检索已发表的同行评审文献;使用ProQuest学位论文数据库、国家灰色文献库、PsycExtra并通过谷歌搜索灰色文献。

结果

从37197条记录中,纳入了101项研究,包括71项定量研究(22项灰色文献)、27项定性研究(1项灰色文献)和3项混合方法研究(1项灰色文献)。研究分为三个主题:对认知老化的担忧、促进大脑健康的机会以及对痴呆症风险降低和预防的理解。

讨论

研究报告了对大脑健康的不同了解程度,同时也提出了一些关于大脑健康的建议,这些建议有些肤浅,且并不总是与科学共识一致。在对大脑健康了解较少的参与者群体之间存在差异,例如男性、老年人、教育程度和收入较低者以及少数族裔。本综述强调需要围绕促进大脑健康的机会提供明确信息,包括经科学认可的生活方式因素以及更多关于其作用机制的信息。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of what people know about brain health.关于人们对大脑健康了解程度的系统综述。
Ageing Res Rev. 2025 Jan;103:102592. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102592. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
7
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
8
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
9
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Withdrawal versus continuation of chronic antipsychotic drugs for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia.痴呆症老年人行为和心理症状的慢性抗精神病药物撤药与继续用药对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD007726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007726.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward a person-centered return of research results of dementia risk: A pluralistic, constructive expansion.迈向以患者为中心的痴呆症风险研究结果反馈:多元、建设性的拓展。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jul;106(2):540-546. doi: 10.1177/13872877251343319. Epub 2025 Jul 1.