Iwanaga Risa, Sumi Kanako, Kodama Chizuko, Ita Munekatsu, Qasimi Mohammad Ibrahim, Tamura Jun, Nakanishi Ko, Yoshida Yasuhiro, Morimatsu Masami, Matsumura Kayoko, Nakamura Teppei
Department of Biological Safety Research, Chitose Laboratory, Japan Food Research Laboratories, 2-3 Bunkyo, Chitose, Hokkaido 066-0052, Japan.
Department of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 13-Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8586, Japan.
Exp Anim. 2025 Apr 20;74(2):181-188. doi: 10.1538/expanim.24-0132. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
Medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (MMB) anesthesia is the preferred choice for rodents but requires excess volume of intramuscular injection in rabbits, which can lead to muscular damage. This study aimed to evaluate a dual-route MMB administration via the intravenous and subcutaneous routes in rabbits. MMB was administered to male Kbs:JW rabbits with an intravenous injection of 0.2 ml/kg followed by a subcutaneous injection of 0.8 ml/kg, totaling 0.2 mg/kg medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg midazolam, and 2.0 mg/kg butorphanol. We compared the anesthetic effects of this dual-route method with those of intramuscular administration. The dual-route method resulted in a shorter induction time and similar anesthetic duration compared with those of the intramuscular route. While it induced a temporary decrease in body temperature within 30 min post-injection, other vital signs, such as respiration rate, heart rate, and O saturation, remained similar. Notably, unlike intramuscular administration, dual-route administration did not increase tissue injury marker levels. This dual-route MMB administration provided sufficient anesthetic depth during surgery, eliminating pain reflexes. Double-dose administration extended anesthetic duration but resulted in rare fatalities, indicating room for protocol improvement. In conclusion, the novel anesthetic method is preferable for injectable anesthesia in rabbits, providing rapid induction and sufficient anesthetic duration, while potentially minimizing muscle injury. This technique may be beneficial for both laboratory and companion animals and significantly enhance animal welfare in anesthesia by reducing the pain associated with injectable anesthesia.
美托咪定、咪达唑仑和布托啡诺(MMB)麻醉是啮齿动物的首选,但在兔子中需要大量肌肉注射,这可能导致肌肉损伤。本研究旨在评估通过静脉和皮下双途径给兔子注射MMB的效果。给雄性Kbs:JW兔子静脉注射0.2 ml/kg,随后皮下注射0.8 ml/kg,美托咪定总量为0.2 mg/kg,咪达唑仑为2.0 mg/kg,布托啡诺为2.0 mg/kg。我们将这种双途径给药方法的麻醉效果与肌肉注射给药的效果进行了比较。与肌肉注射途径相比,双途径方法诱导时间更短,麻醉持续时间相似。虽然它在注射后30分钟内导致体温暂时下降,但其他生命体征,如呼吸频率、心率和血氧饱和度,保持相似。值得注意的是,与肌肉注射不同,双途径给药并未增加组织损伤标志物水平。这种双途径MMB给药在手术期间提供了足够的麻醉深度,消除了疼痛反射。双倍剂量给药延长了麻醉持续时间,但导致罕见的死亡,表明方案有改进空间。总之,这种新型麻醉方法对于兔子注射麻醉更可取,它能提供快速诱导和足够的麻醉持续时间,同时可能将肌肉损伤降至最低。该技术可能对实验动物和伴侣动物都有益,并通过减少与注射麻醉相关的疼痛,显著提高麻醉过程中的动物福利。