Suppr超能文献

多布斯诉杰克逊案后临床医生对青少年避孕咨询的看法:对年轻人避孕自主权的影响

Clinician Perspectives on Adolescent Contraceptive Counseling Following Dobbs v. Jackson: Implications for Young People's Contraceptive Autonomy.

作者信息

Bullington Brooke W, Mann Emily S, Thornton Madeline, Hartheimer Joline, Arora Kavita Shah, Allison Bianca A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Department of Women's and Gender Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

出版信息

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2025 Feb;38(1):75-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Nov 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to understand whether clinicians who provide contraceptive counseling to adolescent patients perceive that the Dobbs decision has influenced their counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted in-depth interviews with a convenience sample of 16 clinicians who provide contraceptive counseling to adolescents at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual conference in October 2022. We used thematic content analysis and an iterative process of constant comparison to identify themes inductively. This analysis focused on participants' perception of if and how the Dobbs decision has or will influence their contraceptive counseling with adolescents.

RESULTS

Most clinicians in our study reported that the Dobbs decision influenced their contraceptive counseling. This included promoting long-acting reversible methods more so than pre-Dobbs, and explicitly considering changing state-level abortion laws and restrictions. Many clinicians openly noted that their personal preferences influence their counseling, such as prioritizing pregnancy prevention and encouraging patients to use particular methods.

CONCLUSION

We found that most clinicians in our sample acknowledged that the Dobbs decision has influenced their contraceptive counseling practices with adolescents. Clinicians' responses demonstrate that, in many instances, the Dobbs decision motivated them to focus on method effectiveness, leading to tiered and directive contraceptive counseling. We recommend practice changes to support comprehensive contraceptive care provision, provider trainings in unbiased counseling, and developmentally tailored decision aids are needed to ensure that adolescent patients' autonomy is prioritized over a singular focus on pregnancy prevention.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是了解为青少年患者提供避孕咨询的临床医生是否认为多布斯裁决对他们的咨询产生了影响。

研究设计

我们在2022年10月的美国儿科学会年会上,对16名向青少年提供避孕咨询的临床医生进行了便利抽样深入访谈。我们采用主题内容分析和持续比较的迭代过程来归纳识别主题。该分析聚焦于参与者对多布斯裁决是否以及如何影响他们对青少年的避孕咨询的看法。

结果

我们研究中的大多数临床医生报告称,多布斯裁决影响了他们的避孕咨询。这包括比多布斯裁决之前更积极地推广长效可逆方法,以及明确考虑州一级堕胎法律和限制的变化。许多临床医生公开表示,他们的个人偏好会影响咨询,比如将预防怀孕放在首位,鼓励患者采用特定方法。

结论

我们发现,样本中的大多数临床医生承认多布斯裁决影响了他们对青少年的避孕咨询实践。临床医生的回应表明,在许多情况下,多布斯裁决促使他们关注方法的有效性,导致了分级和指导性的避孕咨询。我们建议改变做法,以支持提供全面的避孕护理,开展无偏见咨询方面的提供者培训,并开发适合不同发育阶段的决策辅助工具,以确保将青少年患者的自主权置于单一的预防怀孕重点之上。

相似文献

3
Exploring primary care physician biases in adolescent contraceptive counseling.探索初级保健医生在青少年避孕咨询中的偏见。
Contraception. 2025 Jan;141:110706. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110706. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

2
Reproductive Justice as an Alternative to the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm for Teens.生殖正义作为青少年怀孕规划模式的替代方案。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2024 Jul;53(4):345-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
5
Critiquing the Unintended Pregnancy Framework.批判意外妊娠框架。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Mar;68(2):170-178. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13457. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
Options Counseling for the Pregnant Adolescent Patient.青少年孕妇的选择咨询。
Pediatrics. 2022 Sep 1;150(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058781.
9
Restrictive State Abortion Bans - A Reproductive Injustice.限制性州堕胎禁令——一种生殖不公正现象。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1197-1199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2119364. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验