Suppr超能文献

评估美国环保署校车补贴计划对国民健康、教育和空气质量的影响:一项随机对照试验设计。

Assessing the National Health, Education, and Air Quality Benefits of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's School Bus Rebate Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial Design.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health.

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health.

出版信息

Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2024 Oct;2024(221):1-44.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 25 million children ride buses to school in the United States. While school buses remain the safest school transport from a traffic accident perspective, older buses can expose students to high levels of diesel exhaust. These exposures can adversely affect health, which might cause missed school days and reduced learning. To hasten the transition to cleaner, lower-emission vehicles, the US Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) ongoing School Bus Rebate Program randomly allocated over $27 million to replace older, higher-emission school buses with cleaner, lower-emission alternatives between 2012 and 2017. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness of this national program.

METHODS

Leveraging the randomized allocation of rebate funding, we assessed the impacts of the US EPA's 2012-2017 School Bus Rebate Programs on attendance, educational achievement, emergency department (ED) visits for respiratory causes among children in Medicaid, and community air pollution levels. We analyzed all districts linked to applications with complete data using modified intention-to-treat (ITT) modeling for randomized controlled trials, comparing changes in school-district levels of each outcome, after versus before each lottery year, by funding selection status. We also examined the heterogeneity of effects by model years of the replaced buses and by quartiles of estimated ridership on applicant buses.

RESULTS

Of the 3,019 applications that met our inclusion criteria, 406 were randomly selected for funding. The districts that were linked to these applications were similar in terms of size, demographic makeup, funding requests, and socioeconomic status to the districts linked to applications that were not selected for funding. The districts that were linked to applications selected for funding that replaced the oldest buses had improvements in attendance, educational performance, and ambient particulate matter ≤2.5 µm aerodynamic diameter (PM) concentrations in the year after the lottery, compared with districts linked to applications that were not selected for funding. Districts that replaced pre-1990 model year buses had the largest gains, with 0.45 percentage points (pp) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.26 to 0.65 higher attendance (equivalent to 45 additional students attending school each day in an average-size school district of 10,000 students), 0.06 standard deviation (SD) higher reading and language arts (RLA) (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.07), 0.03 SD higher math test scores (0.01 to 0.04), and -1.0 µg/m (-1.5 to -0.5) lower ambient PM concentrations compared with districts not selected for funding. The replacement of model year 2000 and newer buses showed almost no effect on these outcomes. Districts replacing the oldest buses had suggestively higher ED visit rates, but these findings were not statistically distinguishable from no association and were sensitive to differing model specifications.

UNLABELLED

Based on the attendance improvements observed alone, we estimate that the total investment of $27 million by the US EPA for the 2012-2017 lotteries may have resulted in $350 million of benefits per year, although these benefits could not be distinguished from no benefit. Further investment of funds to replace all school buses manufactured before the year 1990 could lead to an additional $400 million of economic benefits per year and replacing all school buses manufactured before the year 2000 could lead to an additional $1.3 billion of economic benefits per year.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the US EPA's School Bus Rebate Program investments to remove very old buses from the fleets have positively affected communities.

摘要

简介

在美国,大约有 2500 万儿童乘坐巴士上学。虽然从交通事故的角度来看,校车仍然是最安全的校车,但旧校车可能会使学生接触到高水平的柴油废气。这些暴露可能会对健康造成不良影响,导致学生缺课和学习成绩下降。为了加快向更清洁、低排放车辆的过渡,美国环境保护署(EPA)正在进行的校车回扣计划在 2012 年至 2017 年间,随机分配了超过 2700 万美元,用于用更清洁、低排放的替代品替换旧的、高排放的校车。在这里,我们评估了这一国家计划的有效性。

方法

利用回扣资金的随机分配,我们评估了美国 EPA 2012-2017 年校车回扣计划对医疗保险中儿童出勤率、教育成就、因呼吸原因到急诊室就诊以及社区空气污染水平的影响。我们分析了所有与申请相关的地区,这些地区的申请数据完整,使用随机对照试验的修改意向治疗(ITT)模型,比较了在每个抽奖年后,根据资金选择状况,学校地区的每个结果水平在前后的变化。我们还通过更换巴士的模型年份和申请人巴士的乘客估计数的四分位数来检查效果的异质性。

结果

在符合我们纳入标准的 3019 份申请中,有 406 份被随机选中获得资金。与未获得资金的申请相关联的地区,在规模、人口结构、资金申请和社会经济地位方面与获得资金的申请相关联的地区相似。获得资金的申请所更换的最旧巴士的地区,在抽奖后的一年中,出勤率、教育表现和环境空气中的细颗粒物(PM)浓度都有所改善,与未获得资金的申请所更换的地区相比,出勤率提高了 0.45 个百分点(95%置信区间:0.26 至 0.65),阅读和语言艺术(RLA)的标准偏差(SD)提高了 0.06(95%置信区间:0.05 至 0.07),数学考试成绩的 SD 提高了 0.03(0.01 至 0.04),环境空气中的 PM 浓度降低了 1.0µg/m(-1.5 至-0.5)。更换 2000 年和更新的巴士模型的效果几乎对这些结果没有影响。更换最旧巴士的地区的急诊就诊率有较高的迹象,但这些发现与无关联无法区分,并且对不同的模型规范敏感。

未加说明

仅根据观察到的出勤率提高情况,我们估计美国 EPA 在 2012-2017 年彩票中投资的 2700 万美元每年可能带来 3.5 亿美元的收益,尽管这些收益可能无法与没有收益区分开来。进一步投资资金以替换所有在 1990 年以前制造的校车,每年可能带来额外的 4 亿美元的经济效益,而替换所有在 2000 年以前制造的校车,每年可能带来额外的 13 亿美元的经济效益。

结论

我们得出结论,美国 EPA 的校车回扣计划投资从车队中淘汰非常旧的巴士,对社区产生了积极的影响。

相似文献

4
Adopting electric school buses in the United States: Health and climate benefits.美国采用电动校车:健康和气候效益。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 28;121(22):e2320338121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320338121. Epub 2024 May 20.
10
In-use fuel economy of hybrid-electric school buses in Iowa.爱荷华州混合动力校车的使用燃料经济性。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2011 May;61(5):504-10. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.5.504.

本文引用的文献

1
Adopting electric school buses in the United States: Health and climate benefits.美国采用电动校车:健康和气候效益。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 28;121(22):e2320338121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320338121. Epub 2024 May 20.
5
Monthly Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter and Their Uncertainty.每月全球细颗粒物估计数及其不确定性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Nov 16;55(22):15287-15300. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05309. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
10
Understanding the Intention-to-treat Principle in Randomized Controlled Trials.理解随机对照试验中的意向性分析原则。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1075-1078. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.8.35985. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验