Division of Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe Universit y, Ankara, Türkiye.
Division of Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Turk J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 16;66(5):578-587. doi: 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2024.4571.
Identifying a foreign body aspiration (FBA) still remains a diagnostic difficulty. Moreover, the indications for bronchoscopy in subjects of suspected foreign bodies are not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pediatric pulmonologists in diagnosing FBA.
This was a retrospective, single-center study on children who underwent rigid bronchoscopy for suspected FBA. Data on the patients were obtained from the medical records. Patients who had foreign bodies (FB) identified during rigid bronchoscopy were classified as FB positive, and those in whom rigid bronchoscopy did not detect FB were defined as FB negative. Demographic data as well as consultation status with a pediatric pulmonologist were compared between these two groups. Furthermore, the patients were categorized into three groups based on their clinical scores that assessed the likelihood of the presence of FB: low risk, moderate risk, and high risk.
Out of 474 rigid bronchoscopies, 232 (48.9%) detected FB. Consultation by a pediatric pulmonologist was not requested in 388 (81.8%). Out of these 388 patients, 206 (53%) were negative for FB. In terms of FB detection success, there was no difference between individuals who sought pulmonology consultation and those who did not (58.1% vs. 53.1% respectively, p=0.059). However, when the children were categorized based on their risk levels, the incidence of detecting FB among children in low-risk group was 42% when they received consultation from the pulmonology department, whereas this incidence dropped to 5.6% when pulmonology consultation was not sought (p<0.001).
Consulting a pediatric pulmonologist, particularly for low-risk individuals, might reduce the likelihood of performing unnecessary bronchoscopies. Given that rigid bronchoscopy is an intrusive technique, it is crucial to reduce the number of negative bronchoscopies in order to mitigate complications associated with it.
识别异物吸入(FBA)仍然是一个诊断难题。此外,对于疑似异物的患者进行支气管镜检查的指征并不明确。本研究旨在评估儿科肺科医生诊断 FBA 的有效性。
这是一项回顾性、单中心研究,纳入因疑似 FBA 而行硬性支气管镜检查的儿童患者。从病历中获取患者数据。在硬性支气管镜检查中发现异物(FB)的患者被归类为 FB 阳性,而在硬性支气管镜检查中未发现 FB 的患者则定义为 FB 阴性。比较两组患者的人口统计学数据以及是否咨询儿科肺科医生。此外,根据评估 FB 存在可能性的临床评分,将患者分为三组:低风险、中风险和高风险。
在 474 例硬性支气管镜检查中,232 例(48.9%)检测到 FB。在 388 例(81.8%)患者中未请求儿科肺科医生会诊。在这 388 例患者中,206 例(53%) FB 检测结果为阴性。在 FB 检测成功率方面,咨询肺科医生与不咨询肺科医生之间没有差异(分别为 58.1%和 53.1%,p=0.059)。然而,当根据风险水平对儿童进行分类时,在接受肺科会诊的低风险组儿童中,FB 的检出率为 42%,而未寻求肺科会诊时,该检出率下降至 5.6%(p<0.001)。
咨询儿科肺科医生,特别是对于低风险个体,可能会降低进行不必要支气管镜检查的可能性。鉴于硬性支气管镜检查是一种侵入性技术,减少阴性支气管镜检查的数量对于减轻与该检查相关的并发症至关重要。