Suppr超能文献

支持人类和猴子时间判断的共同神经机制。

Common neural mechanisms supporting time judgements in humans and monkeys.

机构信息

Life Sciences, Brunel University, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Nov 19;12:e18477. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18477. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

There has been an increasing interest in identifying the biological underpinnings of human time perception, for which purpose research in non-human primates (NHP) is common. Although previous work, based on behaviour, suggests that similar mechanisms support time perception across species, the neural correlates of time estimation in humans and NHP have not been directly compared. In this study, we assess whether brain evoked responses during a time categorization task are similar across species. Specifically, we assess putative differences in post-interval evoked potentials as a function of perceived duration in human EEG (N = 24) and local field potential (LFP) and spike recordings in pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) of one monkey. Event-related potentials (ERPs) differed significantly after the presentation of the temporal interval between "short" and "long" perceived durations in both species, even when the objective duration of the stimuli was the same. Interestingly, the polarity of the reported ERPs was reversed for incorrect trials (, the ERP of a "long" stimulus looked like the ERP of a "short" stimulus when a time categorization error was made). Hence, our results show that post-interval potentials reflect the perceived (rather than the objective) duration of the presented time interval in both NHP and humans. In addition, firing rates in monkey's pre-SMA also differed significantly between short and long perceived durations and were reversed in incorrect trials. Together, our results show that common neural mechanisms support time categorization in NHP and humans, thereby suggesting that NHP are a good model for investigating human time perception.

摘要

人们越来越关注识别人类时间感知的生物学基础,为此,非人类灵长类动物(NHP)的研究很常见。尽管之前的研究基于行为表明,相似的机制支持跨物种的时间感知,但人类和 NHP 中时间估计的神经相关性尚未直接比较。在这项研究中,我们评估在时间分类任务中大脑诱发反应是否在物种间相似。具体来说,我们评估了在人类脑电图(N=24)和前补充运动区(pre-SMA)中的局部场电位(LFP)和尖峰记录中,作为感知持续时间函数的间隔后诱发电位的假定差异在一只猴子中。在两种物种中,即使刺激的客观持续时间相同,在呈现“短”和“长”感知持续时间之间的时间间隔后,事件相关电位(ERP)也有显着差异。有趣的是,对于错误试验,报告的 ERP 的极性是反转的(即,当时间分类错误时,“长”刺激的 ERP 看起来像“短”刺激的 ERP)。因此,我们的结果表明,间隔后电位反映了呈现的时间间隔的感知(而不是客观)持续时间,在 NHP 和人类中都是如此。此外,猴子 pre-SMA 中的放电率在短和长感知持续时间之间也有显着差异,并且在错误试验中反转。总之,我们的结果表明,共同的神经机制支持 NHP 和人类的时间分类,从而表明 NHP 是研究人类时间感知的良好模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验