Suppr超能文献

三种不同充填技术对AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂和EndoCeramic封闭剂推出粘结强度影响的比较评价:一项研究。

Comparative evaluation of the effect of three different obturation techniques on push-out bond strength of AH Plus Bioceramic and EndoCeramic sealers: An study.

作者信息

Vemuri Sayesh, Rachamadugu Eswar Swetha, Naveena Thalabhakthula, Garlapati Roopadevi, Bolla Nagesh, Basam Ram Chowdary

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Oct;27(10):1026-1031. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_345_24. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Effect of three different obturation techniques on bond strength of bioceramic sealers.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the effect of cold lateral compaction, thermafil, and thermoplasticized obturation techniques on the push-out bond strength of AH Plus Bioceramic and EndoCeramic sealers.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

The design of the study was an study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two extracted teeth that were single-rooted and had fully developed apices were chosen, decoronated, and biomechanically prepared using rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments. Samples were divided into two groups of = 21. Group 1: AH Plus Bioceramic sealer, Group 2: EndoCeramic sealer. Then, based on the obturation technique employed, each group was divided into three subgroups ( = 7): subgroups 1a, 2a: Cold lateral compaction; Subgroups 1b, 2b: Thermafil; and Subgroups 1c, 2c: Thermoplasticized (obtura). Using universal testing machine, slices from the middle third of the sample's root were analyzed to determine the push-out bond strength values.

RESULTS

Compared to other groups push-out bond strength was noticeably higher for the cold lateral compaction technique with EndoCeramic sealer (Subgroup 2a), followed by the Thermafil technique with EndoCeramic sealer (Subgroup 2b).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, compared to heat-based obturation techniques, cold lateral compaction showed better push-out bond strength values for both sealers. EndoCeramic sealer resulted in greater push-out bond strength values than AH Plus Bioceramic sealer.

摘要

背景

三种不同充填技术对生物陶瓷封闭剂粘结强度的影响。

目的

本研究旨在探讨冷侧向加压、热塑牙胶尖和热塑充填技术对AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂和EndoCeramic封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响。

设置与设计

本研究为实验性研究。

材料与方法

选取42颗单根且根尖完全发育的离体牙,去除冠部,并用旋转镍钛器械进行生物力学预备。样本分为两组,每组n = 21。第1组:AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂;第2组:EndoCeramic封闭剂。然后,根据所采用的充填技术,每组再分为三个亚组(n = 7):亚组1a、2a:冷侧向加压;亚组1b、2b:热塑牙胶尖;亚组1c、2c:热塑充填。使用万能试验机分析样本牙根中1/3处的切片,以确定推出粘结强度值。

结果

与其他组相比,EndoCeramic封闭剂冷侧向加压技术(亚组2a)的推出粘结强度明显更高,其次是EndoCeramic封闭剂热塑牙胶尖技术(亚组2b)。

结论

在本研究中,与基于热的充填技术相比,冷侧向加压对两种封闭剂均显示出更好的推出粘结强度值。EndoCeramic封闭剂的推出粘结强度值高于AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3431/11581368/5e537352f014/JCDE-27-1026-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验