• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同充填技术对AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂和EndoCeramic封闭剂推出粘结强度影响的比较评价:一项研究。

Comparative evaluation of the effect of three different obturation techniques on push-out bond strength of AH Plus Bioceramic and EndoCeramic sealers: An study.

作者信息

Vemuri Sayesh, Rachamadugu Eswar Swetha, Naveena Thalabhakthula, Garlapati Roopadevi, Bolla Nagesh, Basam Ram Chowdary

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Oct;27(10):1026-1031. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_345_24. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

DOI:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_345_24
PMID:39583269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11581368/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Effect of three different obturation techniques on bond strength of bioceramic sealers.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the effect of cold lateral compaction, thermafil, and thermoplasticized obturation techniques on the push-out bond strength of AH Plus Bioceramic and EndoCeramic sealers.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

The design of the study was an study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two extracted teeth that were single-rooted and had fully developed apices were chosen, decoronated, and biomechanically prepared using rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments. Samples were divided into two groups of = 21. Group 1: AH Plus Bioceramic sealer, Group 2: EndoCeramic sealer. Then, based on the obturation technique employed, each group was divided into three subgroups ( = 7): subgroups 1a, 2a: Cold lateral compaction; Subgroups 1b, 2b: Thermafil; and Subgroups 1c, 2c: Thermoplasticized (obtura). Using universal testing machine, slices from the middle third of the sample's root were analyzed to determine the push-out bond strength values.

RESULTS

Compared to other groups push-out bond strength was noticeably higher for the cold lateral compaction technique with EndoCeramic sealer (Subgroup 2a), followed by the Thermafil technique with EndoCeramic sealer (Subgroup 2b).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, compared to heat-based obturation techniques, cold lateral compaction showed better push-out bond strength values for both sealers. EndoCeramic sealer resulted in greater push-out bond strength values than AH Plus Bioceramic sealer.

摘要

背景

三种不同充填技术对生物陶瓷封闭剂粘结强度的影响。

目的

本研究旨在探讨冷侧向加压、热塑牙胶尖和热塑充填技术对AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂和EndoCeramic封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响。

设置与设计

本研究为实验性研究。

材料与方法

选取42颗单根且根尖完全发育的离体牙,去除冠部,并用旋转镍钛器械进行生物力学预备。样本分为两组,每组n = 21。第1组:AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂;第2组:EndoCeramic封闭剂。然后,根据所采用的充填技术,每组再分为三个亚组(n = 7):亚组1a、2a:冷侧向加压;亚组1b、2b:热塑牙胶尖;亚组1c、2c:热塑充填。使用万能试验机分析样本牙根中1/3处的切片,以确定推出粘结强度值。

结果

与其他组相比,EndoCeramic封闭剂冷侧向加压技术(亚组2a)的推出粘结强度明显更高,其次是EndoCeramic封闭剂热塑牙胶尖技术(亚组2b)。

结论

在本研究中,与基于热的充填技术相比,冷侧向加压对两种封闭剂均显示出更好的推出粘结强度值。EndoCeramic封闭剂的推出粘结强度值高于AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3431/11581368/4de78fdba183/JCDE-27-1026-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3431/11581368/5e537352f014/JCDE-27-1026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3431/11581368/3b82e977b8bf/JCDE-27-1026-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3431/11581368/4de78fdba183/JCDE-27-1026-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3431/11581368/5e537352f014/JCDE-27-1026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3431/11581368/3b82e977b8bf/JCDE-27-1026-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3431/11581368/4de78fdba183/JCDE-27-1026-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the effect of three different obturation techniques on push-out bond strength of AH Plus Bioceramic and EndoCeramic sealers: An study.三种不同充填技术对AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂和EndoCeramic封闭剂推出粘结强度影响的比较评价:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Oct;27(10):1026-1031. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_345_24. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
2
The effect of obturation techniques on the push-out bond strength of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer.不同根管封闭技术对预混生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的推出强度的影响。
J Dent. 2019 Oct;89:103169. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
Evaluation of push-out bond strength of endosequence BC sealer with lateral condensation and thermoplasticized technique: An in vitro study.采用侧向加压和热塑技术评估Endosequence BC封闭剂的推出粘结强度:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):124-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.153075.
4
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of gutta-percha using different sealers with lateral condensation and thermoplasticized obturation technique: An study.使用不同封闭剂并采用侧向加压和热塑牙胶充填技术对牙胶推出粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Nov-Dec;22(6):593-597. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_553_18. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
5
Comparative Assessment of Novel Collagen Cross-linking Agents on Push-out Bond Strength of Two Different Sealers: An Study.新型胶原交联剂对两种不同封闭剂推出粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):1122-1127. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3439.
6
Comparison of the push-out bond strength of two hydraulic calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and an epoxy resin-based sealer.两种水硬性硅酸钙基根管封闭剂与一种环氧树脂基封闭剂的推出粘结强度比较
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Oct 1;15(10):e804-e809. doi: 10.4317/jced.60920. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Dentinal Tubule Penetrability and Bond Strength of Two Novel Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers.两种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透性和粘结强度
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 23;16(9):3309. doi: 10.3390/ma16093309.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Apical Leakage in Root Canal Obturation Using AH Plus Sealer, Bioceramic Sealer, and Bioceramic Sealer Incorporated With Chitosan Nanoparticles: An In Vitro Study.使用AH Plus封闭剂、生物陶瓷封闭剂以及添加壳聚糖纳米颗粒的生物陶瓷封闭剂进行根管充填时根尖微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Dec 9;16(12):e75359. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75359. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
An in vitro Comparison of Bond Strength of Different Sealers/Obturation Systems to Root Dentin Using the Push-Out Test at 2 Weeks and 3 Months after Obturation.一种不同的根管封闭剂/系统在根管填充后 2 周和 3 个月时使用推出试验对牙本质的粘接力的体外比较。
Med Princ Pract. 2017;26(5):464-469. doi: 10.1159/000481623. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
Effect of nonthermal atmospheric plasma on the push-out bond strength of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic root canal sealers: An study.非热大气等离子体对环氧树脂基和生物陶瓷根管封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):41-45. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_500_20. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis of adhesion abilities between AH Plus Bioceramic, Ceraseal and AH Plus on root canal dentine surfaces.AH Plus生物陶瓷、Ceraseal与AH Plus在根管牙本质表面黏附能力的比较分析。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Sep;28(9):881-885. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_406_25. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
2
Effect of different root canal drying techniques on the push-out bond strength of ceraseal sealer - An study.不同根管干燥技术对赛瑞密封剂推出粘结强度的影响——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):642-646. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_211_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
3
Comparative evaluation of bioactive calcium silicate coating on functionalized gutta-percha and its effect on bioceramic sealer wettability - An study.
功能化牙胶尖上生物活性硅酸钙涂层的比较评估及其对生物陶瓷封闭剂润湿性的影响——一项研究
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):613-618. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_159_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
4
Enhancing root canal filling homogeneity: Investigating cross linked and injection molded techniques against single cone method.提高根管充填的均匀性:对比单尖法研究交联技术和注射成型技术。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Mar;28(3):274-278. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_863_24. Epub 2025 Mar 3.