Rane Sushmita, Pandit Varsha, Sachdev Sanpreet S, Chauhan Shivani, Mistry Rishabh, Kumar Barun
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 9;16(12):e75359. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75359. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Introduction Endodontic re-infections primarily occur due to the ingress of bacteria and their toxins through an incomplete seal following obturation. A variety of sealers have been developed to achieve effective integration with the different obturation materials and dentinal tubules. To choose the right endodontic sealer and application for each clinical instance, one must be aware of the attributes of the various sealers commonly used in clinical practice. The utility of chitosan nanoparticles in endodontics requires exploration to understand the faring of this material in comparison to the existing gold standards. This study aims to compare the apical leakage after obturation using AH Plus sealer and bioceramic sealer with and without chitosan nanoparticles. Materials and methods Forty single-rooted, single-canal extracted teeth were selected and decoronated to standardize the root length to 14 mm. Root canals were prepared using Protaper rotary files and irrigated with sodium hypochlorite, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and saline. The samples were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): group I (gutta percha), group II (gutta percha + AH Plus sealer), group III (gutta percha + bioceramic sealer), and group IV (gutta percha + chitosan nanoparticles in bioceramic sealer). The sealers were applied, and obturation was performed using the cold lateral condensation technique. Post-obturation, the samples were sealed with Cavit-G, coated with nail varnish, and immersed in 2% methylene blue dye for 72 hours. The teeth were then sectioned longitudinally and inspected for dye penetration using a stereomicroscope. Results The mean dye penetration values were as follows: 4.77 ± 2.08 mm in group I, 2.93 ± 0.40 mm in group II, 2.34 ± 1.46 mm in group III, and 1.93 ± 1.68 mm in group IV. Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between the groups. Tukey's post hoc test revealed the least microleakage in group IV, indicating superior sealing ability of bioceramic sealer with chitosan nanoparticles. Conclusion Incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles in bioceramic sealer significantly enhances its sealing ability, reducing apical microleakage more effectively than gutta percha (2.5 times), AH Plus sealer (1.5 times), and bioceramic sealer alone (1.2 times). This suggests that chitosan nanoparticles could be a promising addition to endodontic sealers to improve treatment outcomes.
引言
根管再感染主要是由于细菌及其毒素在根管充填后通过不完全封闭处侵入所致。已开发出多种封闭剂,以实现与不同的充填材料和牙本质小管有效结合。为了为每个临床病例选择合适的根管封闭剂及其应用方法,必须了解临床实践中常用的各种封闭剂的特性。壳聚糖纳米颗粒在根管治疗中的效用需要进行探索,以便与现有的金标准相比了解这种材料的性能。本研究旨在比较使用AH Plus封闭剂和生物陶瓷封闭剂(有无壳聚糖纳米颗粒)进行根管充填后的根尖微渗漏情况。
材料与方法
选取40颗单根单根管的离体牙,截冠后将牙根长度标准化为14mm。使用Protaper旋转锉预备根管,并用次氯酸钠、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和生理盐水冲洗。样本随机分为四组(n = 10):第一组(牙胶),第二组(牙胶 + AH Plus封闭剂),第三组(牙胶 + 生物陶瓷封闭剂),第四组(牙胶 + 生物陶瓷封闭剂中的壳聚糖纳米颗粒)。应用封闭剂,采用冷侧向加压充填技术进行根管充填。根管充填后,样本用Cavit - G封闭,涂上指甲油,然后浸入2%亚甲蓝染料中72小时。然后将牙齿纵向切片,使用体视显微镜检查染料渗透情况。
结果
第一组为4.77 ± 2.08mm,第二组为2.93 ± 0.40mm,第三组为2.34 ± 1.46mm,第四组为1.93 ± 1.68mm。使用单因素方差分析进行统计分析显示各组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。Tukey事后检验显示第四组微渗漏最少,表明含壳聚糖纳米颗粒的生物陶瓷封闭剂具有更好的封闭能力。
结论
在生物陶瓷封闭剂中加入壳聚糖纳米颗粒可显著提高其封闭能力,比单纯牙胶(2.5倍)、AH Plus封闭剂(1.5倍)和生物陶瓷封闭剂(1.2倍)更有效地减少根尖微渗漏。这表明壳聚糖纳米颗粒可能是一种有前途的根管封闭剂添加物,可改善治疗效果。