Malik Muhammad Abid, Amjad Amjad Islam, Aslam Sarfraz, Fakhrou Abdulnaser
Shandong Vocational University of Foreign Affairs, Jinan, China.
Department of School Education, Kasur, Punjab, Pakistan.
Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Nov 8;9:1486832. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1486832. eCollection 2024.
The current study explored the influence of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) on the concepts, parameters, policies, and practices of creativity and plagiarism in academic and research writing.
Data were collected from 10 researchers from 10 different countries (Australia, China, the UK, Brazil, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Nigeria, Trinidad and Tobago, and Turkiye) using semi-structured interviews. NVivo was employed for data analysis.
Based on the responses, five themes about the influence of ChatGPT on academic and research writing were generated, i.e., opportunity, human assistance, thought-provoking, time-saving, and negative attitude. Although the researchers were mostly positive about it, some feared it would degrade their writing skills and lead to plagiarism. Many of them believed that ChatGPT would redefine the concepts, parameters, and practices of creativity and plagiarism.
Creativity may no longer be restricted to the ability to write, but also to use ChatGPT or other large language models (LLMs) to write creatively. Some suggested that machine-generated text might be accepted as the new norm; however, using it without proper acknowledgment would be considered plagiarism. The researchers recommended allowing ChatGPT for academic and research writing; however, they strongly advised it to be regulated with limited use and proper acknowledgment.
本研究探讨了聊天生成预训练变换器(ChatGPT)对学术和研究写作中创造力与抄袭的概念、参数、政策及实践的影响。
通过半结构化访谈,从来自10个不同国家(澳大利亚、中国、英国、巴西、巴基斯坦、孟加拉国、伊朗、尼日利亚、特立尼达和多巴哥以及土耳其)的10名研究人员处收集数据。采用NVivo进行数据分析。
基于这些回答,生成了关于ChatGPT对学术和研究写作影响的五个主题,即机会、人力协助、发人深省、节省时间和消极态度。尽管研究人员大多对此持积极态度,但有些人担心它会降低他们的写作技能并导致抄袭。他们中的许多人认为ChatGPT将重新定义创造力和抄袭的概念、参数及实践。
创造力可能不再局限于写作能力,还包括使用ChatGPT或其他大语言模型进行创造性写作。一些人建议机器生成的文本可能会被接受为新规范;然而,未经适当认可使用它将被视为抄袭。研究人员建议在学术和研究写作中允许使用ChatGPT;然而,他们强烈建议对其进行规范,限制使用并给予适当认可。