Suppr超能文献

门诊糖尿病管理对重症患者营养支持期间的血糖控制有影响:一项回顾性观察研究。

Outpatient diabetes management influences glycemic control for critically ill patients during nutrition support: A retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Dickerson Roland N, McLeod Allison R, Stonecipher Alison E, Farrar Julie E, Byerly Saskya, Filiberto Dina M, Fischer Peter E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;40(1):134-146. doi: 10.1002/ncp.11244. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether successful outpatient management of diabetes, as assessed by hemoglobin A1c (Hgb A1c), influences inpatient glycemic control.

METHODS

Adult patients, aged >17 years, admitted to the trauma intensive care unit, who received continuous nutrition therapy, and exhibited a blood glucose concentration (BG) > 149 mg/dl or 8.3 mmol/L were retrospectively evaluated. Controlled diabetes mellitus (DM-C) was defined as a history of DM and a Hgb A1c < 7%. Uncontrolled DM (DM-U) was defined as an Hgb A1c ≥ 7%. Those without a history of DM and an Hgb A1c < 6.5% were classified as without DM (no DM). Patients were managed via intravenous regular human insulin (RHI) infusion or subcutaneous neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin with intravenous sliding scale RHI (SSI) or SSI alone. Target BG range was 70-149 mg/dl (3.9-8.3 mmol/L). Glycemic control was evaluated for the first 7 days of nutrition therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with DM-C, 24 with DM-U, and 32 with no DM were evaluated. Despite no difference in carbohydrate intake, those with DM-U received 70 ± 54 units daily vs 15 ± 16 and 14 ± 18 units daily for the DM-C and no DM groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Target BG range was achieved for 11 ± 5 h/day vs 14 ± 7 and 16 ± 6 h/day, respectively (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Early identification of DM-U would assist in recognizing patients with difficulty achieving glycemic control.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是确定通过糖化血红蛋白(Hgb A1c)评估的糖尿病门诊管理成功与否是否会影响住院患者的血糖控制。

方法

对年龄大于17岁、入住创伤重症监护病房、接受持续营养治疗且血糖浓度(BG)>149mg/dl或8.3mmol/L的成年患者进行回顾性评估。控制良好的糖尿病(DM-C)定义为有糖尿病病史且糖化血红蛋白<7%。未控制的糖尿病(DM-U)定义为糖化血红蛋白≥7%。无糖尿病病史且糖化血红蛋白<6.5%的患者被分类为无糖尿病(无DM)。患者通过静脉输注正规人胰岛素(RHI)或皮下注射中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素加静脉胰岛素调整剂量(SSI)或仅使用SSI进行管理。目标血糖范围为70-149mg/dl(3.9-8.3mmol/L)。在营养治疗的前7天评估血糖控制情况。

结果

对22例DM-C患者、24例DM-U患者和32例无DM患者进行了评估。尽管碳水化合物摄入量无差异,但DM-U患者每日接受70±54单位胰岛素,而DM-C组和无DM组分别为每日15±16单位和14±18单位(P=0.001)。目标血糖范围分别在每天11±5小时、14±7小时和16±6小时达到(P=0.01)。

结论

早期识别DM-U有助于识别血糖控制困难的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验