Suppr超能文献

社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验

Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Coronado Gloria D, Petrik Amanda F, Vollmer William M, Taplin Stephen H, Keast Erin M, Fields Scott, Green Beverly B

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.

Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Approximately 24 million US individuals receive care at federally qualified health centers, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine colorectal cancer screening for individuals aged 50 to 75 years.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program implemented in health centers as part of standard care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial was conducted in 26 federally qualified health center clinics, representing 8 health centers in Oregon and California, randomized to intervention (n = 13) or usual care (n = 13). All participants were overdue for colorectal cancer screening during the accrual interval (February 4, 2014 to February 3, 2015).

INTERVENTIONS

Electronic health record-embedded tools to identify eligible adults and to facilitate implementation of a stepwise mailed intervention involving (1) an introductory letter, (2) a mailed FIT, and (3) a reminder letter; training, collaborative learning, and facilitation through a practice improvement process.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Effectiveness was measured as clinic-level proportions of adults who completed a FIT, and secondarily, any colorectal cancer screening within 12 months of accrual or by August 3, 2015. Implementation was measured as clinic-level proportions of adults who were mailed an introductory letter and ordered a FIT.

RESULTS

Twenty-six clinics with 41 193 adults (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [6.3] years; 22 994 women) were randomized to receive the direct mail colorectal screening intervention (13 clinics; 21 134 patients) or usual care (13 clinics; 20 059 patients). Compared with usual care clinics, intervention clinics had significantly higher adjusted clinic-level proportion of participants who completed a FIT (13.9% vs 10.4%; difference, 3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1%-6.8%) and any colorectal cancer screening (18.3% vs 14.5%; difference, 3.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.6%-7.0%). We observed large variation across health centers in effectiveness (FIT completion differences range, -7.4 percentage points to 17.6 percentage points) and implementation (proportion who were mailed a FIT range, 6.5% to 68.2%). The number needed to mail to achieve a completed FIT was 4.8 overall, and 4.0 in clinics that mailed a FIT reminder.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

An EHR-embedded mailed FIT outreach intervention significantly improved rates of FIT completion and rates of any colorectal cancer screening. Higher rates of colorectal cancer screening occurred in clinics that successfully implemented the mailed outreach program.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01742065.

摘要

重要性

约2400万美国民众在联邦合格健康中心接受治疗,而这些中心历来的结直肠癌筛查率较低。美国预防服务工作组建议对50至75岁的人群进行常规结直肠癌筛查。

目的

确定作为标准护理一部分在健康中心实施的嵌入电子健康记录(EHR)的邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)推广计划的有效性。

设计、设置和参与者:这项整群随机实用临床试验在26家联邦合格健康中心诊所进行,这些诊所代表俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州的8家健康中心,随机分为干预组(n = 13)或常规护理组(n = 13)。所有参与者在纳入期(2014年2月4日至2015年2月3日)均 overdue for 结直肠癌筛查。

干预措施

嵌入电子健康记录的工具,用于识别符合条件的成年人,并促进实施逐步邮寄干预措施,包括(1)一封介绍信,(2)一份邮寄的FIT,以及(3)一封提醒信;通过实践改进过程进行培训、协作学习和促进。

主要结局和指标

有效性以完成FIT的成年人的诊所层面比例来衡量,其次是以纳入期12个月内或2015年8月3日前进行任何结直肠癌筛查的比例来衡量。实施情况以收到介绍信并订购FIT的成年人的诊所层面比例来衡量。

结果

26家诊所的41193名成年人(平均[标准差]年龄为58.5[6.3]岁;22994名女性)被随机分配接受直接邮寄结直肠癌筛查干预(13家诊所;21134名患者)或常规护理(13家诊所;20059名患者)。与常规护理诊所相比,干预诊所完成FIT的参与者的调整后诊所层面比例显著更高(13.9%对10.4%;差异为3.4个百分点;95%置信区间为0.1%-6.8%),以及进行任何结直肠癌筛查的比例也更高(18.3%对14.5%;差异为3.8个百分点;95%置信区间为0.6%-7.0%)。我们观察到各健康中心在有效性(FIT完成差异范围为-7.4个百分点至17.6个百分点)和实施情况(收到FIT邮寄的比例范围为6.5%至68.2%)方面存在很大差异。总体而言,实现一次完成的FIT所需邮寄的数量为4.8封,在邮寄FIT提醒的诊所中为4.0封。

结论及相关性

嵌入EHR的邮寄FIT推广干预显著提高了FIT完成率和任何结直肠癌筛查率。在成功实施邮寄推广计划的诊所中,结直肠癌筛查率更高。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01742065 。

相似文献

9
Effect of Sequential or Active Choice for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10305.

引用本文的文献

2
Sustainability of evidence based interventions implemented in CDC's colorectal cancer control program.
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 9;6(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00734-9.
5
Longitudinal retrospective study of real-world adherence to colorectal cancer screening before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 13;3(1):e001734. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001734. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Monitoring in pragmatic trials lessons from the NIH pragmatic trials collaboratory.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 May;152:107866. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107866. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
9
Organizational readiness for implementation: a qualitative assessment to explain survey responses.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12149-8.
10
Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2364-3.
4
Colorectal cancer screening: 80% by 2018. Colonoscopists simply cannot do it alone.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):552-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.023.
5
The "Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap": Historical Background and Current Conceptualization.
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2938. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
7
Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC.
Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):214-22. doi: 10.1177/1740774515608122. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison.
J Med Screen. 2015 Sep;22(3):119-26. doi: 10.1177/0969141315584694. Epub 2015 May 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验