Laprise Jean-François, Chesson Harrell W, Markowitz Lauri E, Drolet Mélanie, Brisson Marc
Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada (J.F.L., M.D.).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (H.W.C., L.E.M.).
Ann Intern Med. 2025 Jan;178(1):50-58. doi: 10.7326/M24-0421. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
In June 2019, the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended shared clinical decision making regarding potential human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of men and women aged 27 to 45 years ("mid-adults").
To examine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent 1 HPV-related cancer case of expanding HPV vaccination to subgroups of mid-adults at increased risk for HPV-related diseases in the United States.
Individual-based transmission dynamic modeling of HPV transmission and associated diseases using HPV-ADVISE (Agent-based Dynamic model for VaccInation and Screening Evaluation).
Published data.
All U.S. mid-adults and higher-risk subgroups within this population.
100 years.
Health care sector.
Expanding 9-valent HPV vaccination to mid-adults and higher-risk subgroups.
ICERs and NNVs.
RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Expanding 9-valent HPV vaccination to all mid-adults, those with more lifetime partners, and those who have just separated was projected to cost an additional $2 005 000, $763 000, and $1 164 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, respectively. The NNVs to prevent 1 additional HPV-related cancer case were 7670, 3190, and 5150, respectively, compared with 223 for vaccination of persons aged 9 to 26 years (vs. no vaccination).
The mid-adult strategy with the lowest ICER and NNV was vaccinating infrequently screened mid-adult women who have just separated and have a higher number of lifetime sex partners (ICER, $86 000 per QALY gained; NNV, 470).
Uncertainty about rate of new sex partners and natural history of HPV among mid-adults.
Vaccination of mid-adults against HPV is substantially less cost-effective and produces higher NNVs than vaccination of persons younger than 26 years under all scenarios investigated. However, cost-effectiveness and NNV are projected to improve when higher-risk mid-adult subgroups are vaccinated, such as mid-adults with more sex partners and who have recently separated, and women who are underscreened.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2019年6月,美国免疫实践咨询委员会建议就27至45岁成年人(“中年成年人”)潜在的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种进行共同的临床决策。
在美国,研究将HPV疫苗接种扩大到HPV相关疾病风险增加的中年成年亚组以预防1例HPV相关癌症病例的增量成本效益比(ICER)和需接种人数(NNV)。
使用HPV-ADVISE(基于主体的疫苗接种和筛查评估动态模型)对HPV传播及相关疾病进行基于个体的传播动力学建模。
已发表的数据。
所有美国中年成年人及其内的高风险亚组。
100年。
医疗保健部门。
将9价HPV疫苗接种扩大到中年成年人及高风险亚组。
ICER和NNV。
将9价HPV疫苗接种扩大到所有中年成年人、性伴侣较多者以及刚分居者,预计每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)分别需额外花费200.5万美元、76.3万美元和116.4万美元。与9至26岁人群接种疫苗(与未接种相比)预防1例额外HPV相关癌症病例的NNV为223相比,上述人群的NNV分别为7670、3190和5150。
ICER和NNV最低的中年成年人策略是为刚分居且性伴侣数量较多、筛查频率较低的中年成年女性接种疫苗(ICER为每获得一个QALY花费8.6万美元;NNV为470)。
中年成年人中新性伴侣率和HPV自然史存在不确定性。
在所有研究的情况下,中年成年人接种HPV疫苗的成本效益远低于26岁以下人群,且NNV更高。然而,预计为高风险中年成年亚组接种疫苗时,成本效益和NNV会有所改善,例如性伴侣较多且最近分居的中年成年人以及筛查不足的女性。
疾病控制与预防中心。