Suppr超能文献

使用低浓度过氧化氢纳米颗粒光催化剂凝胶的紫光诊室美白效果:一项随机对照试验。

Bleaching efficacy of in-office bleaching with violet light using low-concentration hydrogen peroxide nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Castro Gustavo Garcia, Pinto Palena Araújo, Favoreto Michael Willian, Reis Alessandra, Viviana-Mora Maria, de Miranda Rita de Cássia Mendonça, Cardenas Andres Felipe Milan, Loguercio Alessandro D, Tavarez Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, CEUMA University, Maranhão, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil; School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

出版信息

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2024 Dec;50:104410. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104410. Epub 2024 Nov 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the bleaching efficacy and tooth sensitivity (TS) of participants submitted to different application protocols of in-office bleaching with violet light using 6 % hydrogen peroxide (HP) nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-six participants were randomized and bleached using either a 6 % HP (Nano White, DMC), and/or violet light (Bright Max Whitening, MMOptics), according to the following protocols: 1) only violet light (VIOL); 2) only bleaching gel application (BG) and; 3) combined bleaching gel application + violet light (BG+VIOL). The bleaching efficacy was evaluated with the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer, Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide scales. The risk and intensity of TS were recorded using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 0-4 numerical scale (NRS). Color change and intensity of TS values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used. The absolute risk of TS was compared using the Chi-square test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

A significant and higher degree of bleaching was observed in the BG and BG+VIOL groups compared to the VIOL group (p < 0.003). Despite no significant differences in the risk (p > 0.07) and intensity (p > 0.28) of TS among groups, a higher risk of TS was observed in the BG and BG+VIOL groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Using VIOL reduced the risk of TS but did not improve bleaching. However, BG+VIOL with low-concentration HP nanoparticulate photocatalyst gel achieved equal efficacy and was less likely to cause TS compared to BG.

摘要

目的

本随机对照试验旨在评估使用6%过氧化氢(HP)纳米颗粒光催化剂凝胶并采用不同诊室冷光美白应用方案的参与者的美白效果和牙齿敏感性(TS)。

材料与方法

66名参与者被随机分组,并根据以下方案使用6% HP(纳米美白,DMC)和/或冷光(亮白极致美白,MMOptics)进行美白:1)仅使用冷光(VIOL);2)仅涂抹美白凝胶(BG);3)联合涂抹美白凝胶+冷光(BG+VIOL)。使用Vita Easyshade分光光度计、Vita经典色板和Vita漂白色板评估美白效果。使用0-10视觉模拟量表(VAS)和0-4数字量表(NRS)记录TS的风险和强度。使用单因素方差分析比较颜色变化和TS值强度,并使用Tukey检验。使用卡方检验比较TS的绝对风险(α = 0.05)。

结果

与VIOL组相比,BG组和BG+VIOL组观察到显著且更高程度的美白效果(p < 0.003)。尽管各组之间TS的风险(p > 0.07)和强度(p > 0.28)无显著差异,但BG组和BG+VIOL组观察到更高的TS风险。

结论

使用VIOL可降低TS风险,但不能改善美白效果。然而,与BG相比,低浓度HP纳米颗粒光催化剂凝胶的BG+VIOL方案具有相同的美白效果,且引发TS的可能性较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验