Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Rua Carlos Cavalcanti, Bloco M - Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, 4748, Brazil.
School of Dentistry, Tuiuti University, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 3;28(5):295. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05697-0.
This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the equivalence in the color change, adverse effects, self-perception (AS) and the impact on oral condition (IO) of participants submitted to different application protocols of in-office dental bleaching.
165 participants were bleached with a 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Total Blanc Office One-Step, DFL), according to the following protocols: (1) 2 applications of 20-min each (2 × 20 min); (2) 1 × 40-min and; (3) 1 × 30-min. The color change was evaluated with the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer, Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide scales. The intensity and risk of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI) were recorded using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS). AS and IO was assessed before and after the bleaching procedure using the Orofacial Aesthetic Scale and Oral Health Impact Profile-14, respectively.
Equivalent color change were observed (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between groups. The group 2 × 20 min presented the highest risk of TS (76%, 95% CI 63 to 85), compared to the 1 × 30 min (p < 0.04). The intensity of TS and GI and the risk of GI was similar between groups (p > 0.31). Irrespectively of the group (p = 0.32), significant improvements were observed for all items of AS and IO after bleaching (p < 0.02).
The 1 × 30 min protocol produced equivalent color change to the other bleaching protocols with reduced risk of TS and shorter application time.
A more simplified application regimen of a single application of 30 min yields effective bleaching and patient satisfaction while minimizing undesirable side effects and improving patient satisfaction.
本随机对照试验旨在评估不同诊室牙齿美白应用方案的颜色变化、不良反应、自我感知(AS)和对口腔状况(IO)的影响是否等效。
165 名参与者使用 35%过氧化氢凝胶(Total Blanc Office One-Step,DFL)进行漂白,根据以下方案进行:(1) 2 次,每次 20 分钟(2×20 分钟);(2) 1 次,40 分钟;(3) 1 次,30 分钟。使用 Vita Easyshade 分光光度计、Vita Classical 和 Vita Bleachedguide 比色板评估颜色变化。使用 0-10 视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录牙齿敏感(TS)和牙龈刺激(GI)的强度和风险。使用口腔美学量表和口腔健康影响量表-14 分别在漂白前后评估 AS 和 IO。
观察到等效的颜色变化(p<0.001),各组间无显著差异。2×20 分钟组的 TS 风险最高(76%,95%CI 63 至 85),与 1×30 分钟组相比(p<0.04)。各组间 TS 和 GI 的强度和 GI 风险相似(p>0.31)。无论组间(p=0.32),漂白后所有 AS 和 IO 项目均有显著改善(p<0.02)。
1×30 分钟方案的颜色变化与其他漂白方案等效,TS 风险降低,应用时间缩短。
单次应用 30 分钟的更简化应用方案可产生有效的漂白效果和患者满意度,同时最大限度地减少不良副作用并提高患者满意度。