Krisai Philipp, Belley-Cote Emilie P, McIntyre William F, Wong Jorge, Tsiplova Kate, Brady Katheryn, Joseph Philip, Johansson Isabelle, Johnson Linda, Xing Lucas Yixi, Colli Andrea, McGuinness Shay, Punjabi Prakash, Reents Wilko, Rega Filip, Budera Petr, Royse Alistair G, Paparella Domenico, Connolly Stuart, Whitlock Richard P, Healey Jeff S
Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;27(2):285-292. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3536. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
The left atrial appendage (LAA) produces natriuretic peptides and its removal or occlusion might increase the risk of heart failure (HF). We aimed to investigate the incidence of HF after LAA occlusion or removal (LAAO) in the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS III).
Patients (n = 4811) with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a CHADS-VASc score ≥2, who were having cardiac surgery for another indication, were randomized to undergo surgical LAAO or not. We compared the composite outcome of HF-related hospitalizations and HF death between the two groups. HF assessment required clinical and radiographic evidence of HF. Analyses included a landmark analysis before and after 30 days and subgroups. Mean age was 71.2 years, 67.5% were male and 57.0% had prior HF. Over a mean follow-up of 3.8 years, 396 (8.3%) patients met the composite HF outcome: 209 (8.8%) with LAAO (n = 2379) and 187 (7.8%) without LAAO (n = 2391) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.37, p = 0.25). There was no difference between the two groups in the first 30 days (1.6% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.12) and thereafter (7.6% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.57). Subgroups based on age, sex, body mass index, AF type, prior HF, cardiac rhythm or left ventricular ejection fraction showed consistent results. There was no difference in HF outcomes with LAAO between the cut-and-sew (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.23, p = 0.62) versus other closure methods (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.77-1.41, p = 0.77).
Left atrial appendage occlusion or removal at the time of cardiac surgery does not appear to alter the risk of HF-related hospitalization or death.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01561651.
左心耳(LAA)可产生利钠肽,切除或封堵左心耳可能会增加心力衰竭(HF)风险。我们旨在研究左心耳封堵术或切除术(LAAO)后心力衰竭的发生率,该研究为左心耳封堵术研究(LAAOS III)。
纳入4811例心房颤动(AF)且CHADS-VASc评分≥2分、因其他指征需行心脏手术的患者,随机分为接受外科左心耳封堵术组和未接受该手术组。比较两组心力衰竭相关住院和心力衰竭死亡的复合结局。心力衰竭评估需要心力衰竭的临床和影像学证据。分析包括30天前后的标志性分析和亚组分析。平均年龄71.2岁,67.5%为男性,57.0%既往有心力衰竭病史。平均随访3.8年,396例(8.3%)患者达到心力衰竭复合结局:左心耳封堵术组209例(8.8%)(n = 2379),未行左心耳封堵术组187例(7.8%)(n = 2391)(风险比[HR]1.12,95%置信区间[CI]0.92 - 1.37,p = 0.25)。两组在术后30天内无差异(1.6%对1.1%;p = 0.12),术后30天之后也无差异(7.6%对7.1%;p = 0.57)。基于年龄、性别、体重指数、房颤类型、既往心力衰竭病史、心律或左心室射血分数的亚组分析结果一致。缝合结扎法(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.70 - 1.23,p = 0.62)与其他封堵方法(HR 1.05,95% CI 0.77 - 1.41,p = 0.77)相比,左心耳封堵术的心力衰竭结局无差异。
心脏手术时进行左心耳封堵或切除似乎不会改变心力衰竭相关住院或死亡的风险。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01561651。