• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项抗高血压药物特殊包装的随机试验。

A randomized trial of special packaging of antihypertensive medications.

作者信息

Becker L A, Glanz K, Sobel E, Mossey J, Zinn S L, Knott K A

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1986 Apr;22(4):357-61.

PMID:3958683
Abstract

This article reports a randomized controlled trial designed to test the effects of special packaging of antihypertensive medication on compliance and blood pressure control. One hundred eighty subjects who had exhibited elevated blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg in the two years prior to the study were recruited from patients receiving care at a community hospital-based family medicine practice. After completing preenrollment interviews and blood pressure measurements, subjects were randomly assigned to receive their antihypertensive medications either in the usual vials or in special unit dose-reminder packaging. Follow-up interviews, pill counts, and blood pressure measurements were performed at three-month intervals. There were no statistically significant differences between the control and experimental groups with regard to age, sex, race, employment, education, marital status, insurance coverage, or blood pressure regimens. Prior to the intervention, the experimental group had slightly lower diastolic blood pressure and reported better compliance than the control group. Analyses performed on 165 subjects completing the first follow-up visit revealed no significant improvements in blood pressure control or compliance for patients receiving special medication packaging. While some patients found it easy to remember to take pills packaged using this format, they also found the packages somewhat more difficult and inconvenient to use. In contrast to previously reported work, this study did not demonstrate any significant improvement in compliance with special packaging of antihypertensive medications.

摘要

本文报告了一项随机对照试验,旨在测试抗高血压药物的特殊包装对依从性和血压控制的影响。从一家社区医院家庭医学诊所接受治疗的患者中招募了180名在研究前两年血压高于90 mmHg的受试者。在完成预注册访谈和血压测量后,受试者被随机分配接受常规药瓶包装或特殊单位剂量提醒包装的抗高血压药物。每隔三个月进行一次随访访谈、清点药丸数量和测量血压。在年龄、性别、种族、就业、教育、婚姻状况、保险范围或血压治疗方案方面,对照组和实验组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在干预前,实验组的舒张压略低于对照组,且报告的依从性更好。对完成首次随访的165名受试者进行的分析显示,接受特殊药物包装的患者在血压控制或依从性方面没有显著改善。虽然一些患者发现使用这种包装形式的药丸很容易记住服用,但他们也发现这种包装使用起来有点困难和不方便。与之前报道的研究不同,本研究没有证明抗高血压药物特殊包装在依从性方面有任何显著改善。

相似文献

1
A randomized trial of special packaging of antihypertensive medications.一项抗高血压药物特殊包装的随机试验。
J Fam Pract. 1986 Apr;22(4):357-61.
2
Patterns of compliance with once versus twice daily antihypertensive drug therapy in primary care: a randomized clinical trial using electronic monitoring.基层医疗中一日一次与一日两次抗高血压药物治疗的依从性模式:一项使用电子监测的随机临床试验
Can J Cardiol. 1997 Oct;13(10):914-20.
3
Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.一项三期、为期8周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估坎地沙坦酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1924-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.018.
4
Blood pressure reduction and antihypertensive medication use in the losartan intervention for endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy.高血压左心室肥厚患者氯沙坦干预降低终点事件(LIFE)研究中的血压降低及降压药物使用情况
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Feb;23(2):259-70. doi: 10.1185/030079906X162854.
5
Nurse-led adherence support in hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.护士主导的高血压依从性支持:一项随机对照试验。
Fam Pract. 2005 Apr;22(2):144-51. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh717. Epub 2005 Jan 17.
6
Blood pressure levels, risk factors and antihypertensive treatments: lessons from the SHEAF study.血压水平、危险因素与抗高血压治疗:来自SHEAF研究的经验教训。
J Hum Hypertens. 2001 Dec;15(12):841-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001280.
7
Factors associated with drug adherence and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension.高血压患者药物依从性和血压控制的相关因素。
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Apr;26(4):483-92. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.4.483.
8
The Take Control of Your Blood pressure (TCYB) study: study design and methodology.控制你的血压(TCYB)研究:研究设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Jan;28(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Aug 16.
9
Self-recording of blood pressure in the management of hypertension.高血压管理中的血压自我记录
Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Nov 4;119(9):1034-9.
10
[Antihypertensive effect and safety evaluation of vegetable drink with peptides derived from sardine protein hydrolysates on mild hypertensive, high-normal and normal blood pressure subjects].[沙丁鱼蛋白水解物衍生肽蔬菜饮料对轻度高血压、高正常血压和正常血压受试者的降压效果及安全性评价]
Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2002 Oct;93(10):208-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Patient-Centered Behavioral Economics Intervention on Hypertension Control in a Highly Disadvantaged Population: a Randomized Trial.以患者为中心的行为经济学干预对高度弱势群体高血压控制的影响:一项随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):70-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05269-z. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
Views of patients and professionals about electronic multicompartment medication devices: a qualitative study.患者和专业人员对电子多隔层给药装置的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 17;6(10):e012915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012915.
3
Systematic review of the health and societal effects of medication organisation devices.
药物组织装置对健康和社会影响的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 6;16:202. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1446-y.
4
Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Hypertensive Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.改善高血压患者药物依从性的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Dec;17(12):94. doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0606-5.
5
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.提高药物依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;2014(11):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4.
6
Packaging interventions to increase medication adherence: systematic review and meta-analysis.包装干预措施以提高药物依从性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Jan;31(1):145-60. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.978939. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
7
Effect of drug reminder packaging on medication adherence: a systematic review revealing research gaps.药物提醒包装对药物依从性的影响:一项揭示研究空白的系统评价
Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 24;3:29. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-29.
8
Improving adherence with medication: a selective literature review based on the example of hypertension treatment.提高药物依从性:以高血压治疗为例的选择性文献回顾。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Jan 24;111(4):41-7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0041.
9
How do the attitudes and beliefs of older people and healthcare professionals impact on the use of multi-compartment compliance aids?: a qualitative study using grounded theory.老年人的态度和信念以及医疗保健专业人员如何影响多腔室依从性辅助工具的使用?:一项使用扎根理论的定性研究。
Drugs Aging. 2011 May 1;28(5):403-14. doi: 10.2165/11587180-000000000-00000.
10
Cardiovascular medication: improving adherence.心血管药物治疗:提高依从性。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Apr 11;2011:0220.