Suppr超能文献

去殖民化在性与生殖健康研究方法中的应用:范围综述。

Decolonization in sexual and reproductive health research methods: a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Global Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 25;24(1):1460. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11817-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As researchers and practitioners in the field of global health continue to acknowledge the ongoing impact of colonialism in their work, the call for decolonized research has increased. This has particular relevance in the field of sexual and reproductive health. Despite this recognized need, there is no singularly agreed upon definition of what it means to conduct decolonized research using decolonized methodologies. The aim of this review is to explore the approaches and methodologies used in contemporary sexual and reproductive health research aligned with decolonized systems of thinking.

METHODS

This review was developed and conducted in accordance with the JBI and the Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. In January 2023, Medline (Ovid), Embase, EMCare, Global Health Database, and Web of Science were systematically searched for relevant studies. Relevant grey literature was also scanned. The screening and data extraction were conducted by four independent reviewers using an iterative approach. The findings were analyzed to uncover shared characteristics between the studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1775 articles were retrieved through our search strategy, of which 35 were included as discussing sexual health topics, and representing the principles of decolonization. Few of the included articles explicitly self-identified as decolonized literature. Common themes between studies included that most of the data collection was conducted in high-income countries, largely in North America, and the most prevalent sexual health topics were HIV/AIDs, and STIs/STDs. Most studies were qualitative, used community-based methodologies, and included some form of community advisory board.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review identifies shared characteristics of both successes and gaps in decolonized research that may inform the methodological processes of future researchers. It emphasizes the need for more decolonized research originating in low- and middle-income countries, as well as decolonization of quantitative research methodologies. The findings also emphasize the importance of community engagement throughout the research process. A shared definition of decolonization is necessary to codify this body of work. Future researchers should focus on clearly communicating their approach in the methodology so that it can be replicated and become part of a shared definition. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/45771.

摘要

背景

随着全球健康领域的研究人员和从业者在工作中不断认识到殖民主义的持续影响,呼吁开展去殖民化研究的呼声越来越高。这在性健康和生殖健康领域尤为相关。尽管有这种公认的需求,但对于使用去殖民化方法进行去殖民化研究意味着什么,并没有一个单一的共识定义。本综述的目的是探讨与去殖民化思维系统一致的当代性健康和生殖健康研究中使用的方法和方法。

方法

本综述是根据 JBI 和扩展的 scoping 综述(PRISMA-ScR)清单制定和进行的。2023 年 1 月,系统地检索了 Medline(Ovid)、Embase、EMCare、全球健康数据库和 Web of Science 以获取相关研究。还扫描了相关灰色文献。四名独立评审员使用迭代方法进行筛选和数据提取。分析研究结果以揭示研究之间的共同特征。

结果

通过我们的搜索策略共检索到 1775 篇文章,其中 35 篇文章讨论了性健康主题,并代表了去殖民化的原则。少数纳入的文章明确将自己视为去殖民化文献。研究之间的共同主题包括,大多数数据收集是在高收入国家进行的,主要是在北美,最常见的性健康主题是艾滋病毒/艾滋病和性传播感染/性传播疾病。大多数研究是定性的,使用基于社区的方法,并包括某种形式的社区咨询委员会。

结论

本 scoping 综述确定了去殖民化研究的成功和差距的共同特征,这可能为未来研究人员的方法过程提供信息。它强调需要更多来自低收入和中等收入国家的去殖民化研究,以及对定量研究方法的去殖民化。研究结果还强调了在整个研究过程中社区参与的重要性。需要一个去殖民化的共同定义来编纂这一工作。未来的研究人员应专注于在方法中清楚地传达他们的方法,以便可以复制并成为共同定义的一部分。国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/45771。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/11587638/e7fc8b460bf8/12913_2024_11817_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验