• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能聊天机器人依赖量表的编制与验证

The Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Dependence Scale.

作者信息

Zhang Xing, Yin Mingyue, Zhang Mingyang, Li Zhaoqian, Li Hansen

机构信息

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

School of Athletic performance, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2025 Feb;28(2):126-131. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2024.0240. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1089/cyber.2024.0240
PMID:39587942
Abstract

In recent years, a plethora of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have been developed and made available to the public. Consequently, an increasing number of individuals are integrating AI chatbots into their daily lives for various purposes. This trend has also raised concerns regarding AI chatbot dependence. However, a valid and reliable scale to assess AI chatbot dependence is yet to be developed. Therefore, this study was designed to develop and validate an AI chatbot dependence scale. We obtained initial items from previous publications and in-depth interviews. Subsequently, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability, and validity analyses were performed to validate the AI chatbot dependence scale. Seventeen items underwent item analysis and EFA, resulting in a single-factor model with eight items explaining 58.42% of the total variance. The CFA indicated that our AI chatbot dependence scale had acceptable model fitting indices, with standardized loadings ranging between 0.50 and 0.76. In addition, this scale exhibited good reliability and validity. Thus, the current AI chatbot dependence scale can effectively evaluate individuals' dependence on AI chatbots in their daily lives.

摘要

近年来,大量的人工智能(AI)聊天机器人已被开发并向公众开放。因此,越来越多的人出于各种目的将AI聊天机器人融入他们的日常生活。这一趋势也引发了对AI聊天机器人依赖的担忧。然而,一个有效且可靠的评估AI聊天机器人依赖程度的量表尚未开发出来。因此,本研究旨在开发并验证一个AI聊天机器人依赖量表。我们从先前的出版物和深入访谈中获取了初始项目。随后,进行了项目分析、探索性因素分析(EFA)、验证性因素分析(CFA)、信度和效度分析,以验证AI聊天机器人依赖量表。17个项目进行了项目分析和EFA,得到了一个单因素模型,其中8个项目解释了总方差的58.42%。CFA表明,我们的AI聊天机器人依赖量表具有可接受的模型拟合指数,标准化载荷在0.50至0.76之间。此外,该量表表现出良好的信度和效度。因此,当前的AI聊天机器人依赖量表可以有效地评估个体在日常生活中对AI聊天机器人的依赖程度。

相似文献

1
The Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Dependence Scale.人工智能聊天机器人依赖量表的编制与验证
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2025 Feb;28(2):126-131. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2024.0240. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
2
Exploring artificial intelligence (AI) Chatbot usage behaviors and their association with mental health outcomes in Chinese university students.探索中国大学生使用人工智能(AI)聊天机器人的行为及其与心理健康结果的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jul 1;380:394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.141. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS) - development, validity and reliability study.医学生医学人工智能准备度量表(MAIRS-MS)——开发、效度与信度研究
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02546-6.
4
Nursing education in the age of artificial intelligence powered Chatbots (AI-Chatbots): Are we ready yet?人工智能驱动的聊天机器人(AI-Chatbots)时代的护理教育:我们准备好了吗?
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Oct;129:105917. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105917. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Behavior Change Model for Designing Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to Promote Physical Activity and a Healthy Diet: Viewpoint.人工智能聊天机器人行为改变模型设计人工智能聊天机器人促进身体活动和健康饮食:观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 30;22(9):e22845. doi: 10.2196/22845.
6
Expert and Interdisciplinary Analysis of AI-Driven Chatbots for Mental Health Support: Mixed Methods Study.用于心理健康支持的人工智能驱动聊天机器人的专家和跨学科分析:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e67114. doi: 10.2196/67114.
7
Knowledge and use, perceptions of benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence chatbots among Italian physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional national study.意大利物理治疗专业学生对人工智能聊天机器人的了解与使用、对其益处和局限性的认知:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07176-w.
8
Validating the ChatGPT Usage Scale: psychometric properties and factor structures among postgraduate students.验证 ChatGPT 使用量表:研究生群体的心理测量学特性和因子结构。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 24;12(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01983-4.
9
Accuracy of Prospective Assessments of 4 Large Language Model Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions About Emergency Care: Experimental Comparative Study.前瞻性评估 4 种大型语言模型聊天机器人对患者关于急救护理问题的回答的准确性:实验性对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 4;26:e60291. doi: 10.2196/60291.
10
Evaluation of validity and reliability of AI Chatbots as public sources of information on dental trauma.评估人工智能聊天机器人作为牙科创伤公共信息来源的有效性和可靠性。
Dent Traumatol. 2025 Apr;41(2):187-193. doi: 10.1111/edt.13000. Epub 2024 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological issues in behavioral addictions' research: A call for an unbiased analysis of excessive behaviors.行为成瘾研究中的方法学问题:呼吁对过度行为进行无偏见分析。
Addict Behav Rep. 2025 Feb 27;21:100594. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100594. eCollection 2025 Jun.