Karaca Ozan, Çalışkan S Ayhan, Demir Kadir
Department of Medical Education, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Dokuz Eylül University Buca Faculty of Education, İzmir, Turkey.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02546-6.
It is unlikely that applications of artificial intelligence (AI) will completely replace physicians. However, it is very likely that AI applications will acquire many of their roles and generate new tasks in medical care. To be ready for new roles and tasks, medical students and physicians will need to understand the fundamentals of AI and data science, mathematical concepts, and related ethical and medico-legal issues in addition with the standard medical principles. Nevertheless, there is no valid and reliable instrument available in the literature to measure medical AI readiness. In this study, we have described the development of a valid and reliable psychometric measurement tool for the assessment of the perceived readiness of medical students on AI technologies and its applications in medicine.
To define medical students' required competencies on AI, a diverse set of experts' opinions were obtained by a qualitative method and were used as a theoretical framework, while creating the item pool of the scale. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were applied.
A total of 568 medical students during the EFA phase and 329 medical students during the CFA phase, enrolled in two different public universities in Turkey participated in this study. The initial 27-items finalized with a 22-items scale in a four-factor structure (cognition, ability, vision, and ethics), which explains 50.9% cumulative variance that resulted from the EFA. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.87. CFA indicated appropriate fit of the four-factor model (χ/df = 3.81, RMSEA = 0.094, SRMR = 0.057, CFI = 0.938, and NNFI (TLI) = 0.928). These values showed that the four-factor model has construct validity.
The newly developed Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students (MAIRS-MS) was found to be valid and reliable tool for evaluation and monitoring of perceived readiness levels of medical students on AI technologies and applications. Medical schools may follow 'a physician training perspective that is compatible with AI in medicine' to their curricula by using MAIRS-MS. This scale could be benefitted by medical and health science education institutions as a valuable curriculum development tool with its learner needs assessment and participants' end-course perceived readiness opportunities.
人工智能(AI)的应用不太可能完全取代医生。然而,AI应用很可能会在医疗保健中承担许多角色并产生新的任务。为了做好准备承担新的角色和任务,医学生和医生除了需要掌握标准医学原则外,还需要了解AI和数据科学的基础知识、数学概念以及相关的伦理和医学法律问题。然而,文献中没有有效的可靠工具来衡量对医疗AI的准备程度。在本研究中,我们描述了一种有效且可靠的心理测量工具的开发,用于评估医学生对AI技术及其在医学中的应用的感知准备程度。
为了确定医学生在AI方面所需的能力,通过定性方法获得了不同专家的意见,并将其用作理论框架,同时创建量表的项目池。应用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。
在EFA阶段共有568名医学生,在CFA阶段有329名医学生,他们就读于土耳其的两所不同公立大学,参与了本研究。最初的27个项目最终确定为一个包含22个项目的量表,具有四因素结构(认知、能力、视野和伦理),该结构解释了EFA产生的50.9%的累积方差。克朗巴哈α信度系数为0.87。CFA表明四因素模型拟合良好(χ/df = 3.81,RMSEA = 0.