• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

掌握在卫生专业教育学院中应用课程评估模式的五种方法。

Five ways to get a grip on applying a program evaluation model in health professions education academies.

机构信息

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA.

Duke University School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2024 Nov 13;15(5):142-145. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77995. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.36834/cmej.77995
PMID:39588030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11586015/
Abstract

The proliferation of health professions educator academies across Canada and the United States illustrates the value they hold for faculty and institutions. Yet, establishing and evaluating the efficacy of them through program evaluation can be challenging. Moreover, academy leadership often lack the time, bandwidth skillset and personnel to undertake rigorous program evaluation efforts. We outline a step-by-step guide for getting a grip on evaluating health professions educator academies. Developing a plan for program evaluation in advance of any new academy initiative helps to ensure the academy calibrates and re-calibrates to accomplish outcomes and meet stakeholder expectations. It also provides a mechanism for tracking academy impact, which strengthens requests for funding, promotes sustainability and encourages continued buy-in and support from institutional stakeholders. For all of these reasons, we present the following recommendations: apply the relevant program evaluation framework(s); identify resources for program evaluation; prepare to tell your academy's story; list desired program outcomes; establish a data collection plan; and obtain institutional review board approval.

摘要

加拿大和美国的健康专业教育者学会的大量涌现说明了它们对教师和机构的价值。然而,通过项目评估来建立和评估它们的效果可能具有挑战性。此外,学会领导层通常缺乏时间、带宽、技能和人员来进行严格的项目评估工作。我们概述了一步一步的指南,以掌握健康专业教育者学会的评估。在任何新的学会倡议之前制定项目评估计划有助于确保学会进行校准和重新校准,以实现成果并满足利益相关者的期望。它还为跟踪学会的影响提供了一种机制,这加强了对资金的请求,促进了可持续性,并鼓励机构利益相关者的持续投入和支持。基于所有这些原因,我们提出以下建议:应用相关的项目评估框架;确定项目评估资源;准备讲述学会的故事;列出预期的项目成果;建立数据收集计划;并获得机构审查委员会的批准。

相似文献

1
Five ways to get a grip on applying a program evaluation model in health professions education academies.掌握在卫生专业教育学院中应用课程评估模式的五种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Nov 13;15(5):142-145. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77995. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Building capacity for education research among clinical educators in the health professions: A BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) Systematic Review of the outcomes of interventions: BEME Guide No. 34.提升卫生专业临床教育工作者的教育研究能力:BEME(最佳证据医学教育)干预效果系统评价:BEME指南第34号
Med Teach. 2016;38(2):123-36. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112893. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.
10
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A decade of faculty development for health professions educators: lessons learned from the Macy Faculty Scholars Program.医学专业学术文献:十年卫生职业教育者师资发展:梅肯学者计划的经验教训。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04155-x.
2
Using an implementation science framework to advance the science of nursing education.运用实施科学框架推进护理教育科学。
J Prof Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;39:139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.01.014. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Frameworks to Guide Faculty Development for Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review.指导健康职业教育教师发展的框架:范围综述。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022 Jul 1;42(3):180-189. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000376. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
4
Eco-Normalization: Evaluating the Longevity of an Innovation in Context.生态正常化:在背景下评估创新的持久性。
Acad Med. 2021 Nov 1;96(11S):S48-S53. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004318.
5
Academies in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review.卫生职业教育学术机构:范围综述。
Acad Med. 2021 Oct 1;96(10):1476-1483. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004161.
6
Evaluation of a Health Professions Teaching Academy Through the Lens of Social Capital.从社会资本视角评估健康职业教学学院
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):53-59. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000357.
7
An Evaluation of Faculty Development Programs for Clinician-Educators: A Scoping Review.临床教师师资发展项目评价:范围综述。
Acad Med. 2021 Apr 1;96(4):599-606. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003813.
8
Faculty development program evaluation: a need to embrace complexity.教师发展项目评估:需要接受复杂性。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Apr 16;10:191-199. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S188164. eCollection 2019.
9
The Impact of an Academy of Medical Educators on the Culture of an American Health Sciences Campus.医学教育者学会对美国健康科学园区文化的影响。
Acad Med. 2017 Aug;92(8):1145-1150. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001508.
10
Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation.教育工作者精选文集:关于项目评估的五篇关键论文。
Cureus. 2017 May 4;9(5):e1224. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1224.