Suppr超能文献

早期宫颈癌前哨淋巴结活检后的生存:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy for early cervical cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy

Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Institute Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Dec 4;33(12):1853-1860. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004726.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy represents an alternative to pelvic lymphadenectomy for lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma, but prospective evidence on long-term oncological safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone versus pelvic lymphadenectomy is missing.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate, with this meta-analysis, the impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy alone versus pelvic lymphadenectomy on survival for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed. We excluded studies in which pelvic lymphadenectomy was systematically performed after every sentinel lymph node biopsy, including only articles where pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed because sentinel lymph node biopsy was not conclusive. A meta-analysis was carried out combining 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates with a random and fixed effect model. Heterogeneity was tested using the Cochran Χ test and quantified with Higgins information I2.

RESULTS

The search of databases and registers found 927 items and six articles (two retrospective and four prospective). The median time of follow-up was 34.8 months (range 13-53). Overall common effect disease-free survival was 98% while random effect disease-free survival was 94%. Overall heterogeneity was 77%. A subgroup analysis was applied, dividing studies into one group including sentinel lymph node biopsy negative data only (common effect disease-free survival 91%; random effect disease-free survival 90%), and one group with a negative and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (common effect disease-free survival 98%; random effect disease-free survival 96%). In the analysis of overall survival, positive and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy cases were examined together (common and random effect overall survival 99%). Ultrastaging did not affect disease-free survival (common and random effect disease-free survival 92% in the ultrastaging group vs common effect disease-free survival 99% and random effect disease-free survival 96% in the non-ultrastaging group).

CONCLUSIONS

Both 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rate after sentinel lymph node biopsy alone are higher than 90% and do not differ from pelvic lymphadenectomy survival data. Ultrastaging did not impact survival.

摘要

背景

前哨淋巴结活检术代表了一种替代盆腔淋巴结清扫术的方法,用于早期宫颈癌的淋巴结分期,但缺乏关于单独使用前哨淋巴结活检术与盆腔淋巴结清扫术在长期肿瘤学安全性方面的前瞻性证据。

目的

通过这项荟萃分析,研究单独使用前哨淋巴结活检术与盆腔淋巴结清扫术对早期宫颈癌患者生存的影响。

方法

进行了系统的文献回顾。我们排除了那些在每次前哨淋巴结活检后系统进行盆腔淋巴结清扫的研究,只包括那些因为前哨淋巴结活检结果不确定而进行盆腔淋巴结清扫的文章。采用随机和固定效应模型对 5 年无病生存率和总生存率进行了荟萃分析。使用 Cochran Χ 检验测试异质性,并使用 Higgins 信息 I2 进行量化。

结果

数据库和注册中心的搜索共发现 927 项内容和 6 篇文章(2 篇回顾性研究和 4 篇前瞻性研究)。中位随访时间为 34.8 个月(范围 13-53 个月)。总体共同效应无病生存率为 98%,而随机效应无病生存率为 94%。总体异质性为 77%。进行了亚组分析,将研究分为仅包括前哨淋巴结活检阴性数据的一组(共同效应无病生存率为 91%;随机效应无病生存率为 90%)和包括前哨淋巴结活检阳性和阴性数据的一组(共同效应无病生存率为 98%;随机效应无病生存率为 96%)。在总生存分析中,同时检查了前哨淋巴结活检阳性和阴性病例(共同和随机效应总生存率为 99%)。超分期并未影响无病生存率(超分期组的共同和随机效应无病生存率为 92%,而非超分期组的共同效应无病生存率为 99%,随机效应无病生存率为 96%)。

结论

单独使用前哨淋巴结活检术的 5 年无病生存率和总生存率均高于 90%,且与盆腔淋巴结清扫术的生存数据无差异。超分期未影响生存。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验