VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
World J Urol. 2024 Nov 26;42(1):646. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05373-8.
To assess active surveillance (AS) adherence for prostate cancer (PCa) in a "real-world" clinical practice.
We utilized our institutional database which was built by interrogating electronic medical records for all men who got diagnosed with PCa from 1995 to 2022. Our cohort included all patients aged < 76 years, with PCa Gleason Grade (GG) 1 or 2, ≤ cT2c, PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml at diagnosis, enrolled on AS, and with at least one biopsy after diagnosis. Patients were separated into two groups based on the monitoring intensity. Patients with at least 1 PSA/year and at least 1 biopsy every 4 years were categorized as adherent to guidelines. Univariable and Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the impact of covariates on non-adherence to guidelines. Competing risks cumulative incidence was used to depict prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM).
A total of 546 men met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 63 (11%) patients were adherent to guidelines (Group 1), while 483 (89%) were not (Group 2). Median PSAs/year and median biopsies/year were 2.3 (2.0-2.7) and 0.4 (0.3-0.6) for Group 1, and 1.2 (0.7-1.8) and 0.2 (0.1-0.2) for Group 2, respectively (both p < 0.0001). At multivariable analysis, Black men had a 2.20-fold higher risk of being in Group 2 than White men (p < 0.05). Patients with cT2 (OR:0.24, CI:0.11-0.52) and those with CCI ≥2 (OR:0.40, CCI:0.19-0.82) were less likely to be in Group 2, when compared to cT1 stage and CCI = 0, respectively (both p < 0.05). At 10 years, the cumulative incidence estimate of PCSM for the entire cohort was 2.1%.
We found substantial deviations from AS monitoring guidelines, particularly in biopsy frequency, which did not seem to compromise PCSM in patients with stable PSA. Notably, our findings suggest that strict adherence to guidelines, especially in patients with cT2 at diagnosis, remains crucial.
评估“真实世界”临床实践中前列腺癌(PCa)的主动监测(AS)依从性。
我们利用机构数据库,通过电子病历查询,获取 1995 年至 2022 年间所有被诊断为 PCa 的男性患者的数据。我们的队列纳入了所有年龄<76 岁、Gleason 分级(GG)为 1 或 2、cT2c 及以下、诊断时 PSA≤20ng/ml、接受 AS 治疗且诊断后至少进行过一次活检的患者。根据监测强度将患者分为两组。至少每年进行一次 PSA 检测和每 4 年进行一次活检的患者被归类为符合指南。单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析用于检查协变量对不符合指南的影响。竞争风险累积发生率用于描述前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)。
共有 546 名男性符合纳入标准。总体而言,63 名(11%)患者符合指南(第 1 组),而 483 名(89%)患者不符合(第 2 组)。第 1 组患者的平均 PSA/年和平均活检/年分别为 2.3(2.0-2.7)和 0.4(0.3-0.6),第 2 组分别为 1.2(0.7-1.8)和 0.2(0.1-0.2)(均 p<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,与白人男性相比,黑人男性更有可能被归入第 2 组,风险比为 2.20(p<0.05)。与 cT1 期和 CCI=0 相比,cT2(OR:0.24,CI:0.11-0.52)和 CCI≥2(OR:0.40,CCI:0.19-0.82)的患者不太可能被归入第 2 组(均 p<0.05)。在 10 年时,整个队列的 PCSM 累积发生率估计为 2.1%。
我们发现 AS 监测指南存在较大偏差,特别是在活检频率方面,这似乎并未影响 PSA 稳定患者的 PCSM。值得注意的是,我们的研究结果表明,严格遵守指南,尤其是在诊断时患有 cT2 的患者中,仍然至关重要。