Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The William Buckland Radiotherapy Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1689-1699. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2047-z. Epub 2017 May 12.
This study aimed to evaluate (1) the time interval between a decision to commence on active surveillance (AS) and grade progression in community practice; (2) factors predicting grade progression in localised prostate cancer (CaP) patients apparently undergoing AS.
Data from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria were used to analyze men with Gleason 3 + 3 CaP or less who had at least one repeat biopsy. Unadjusted and adjusted 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the time to grade progression. Both univariate and multivariate analyses for grade progression were performed using Cox proportional hazards.
The cohort included 951 men. Overall, 39% of men had Gleason grade reclassified to a higher risk disease state with median of 2.2 years [IQR 1.2-3.7 years]. Men who harboured cT2 disease were 30% more likely to have upgrading compared to men with cT1 disease (adjusted HR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6, p = 0.048). Half of the men with cT2 in our cohort had their Gleason grade reclassified within 1.6 years from diagnosis as compared with 2.7 years for the cT1 group. The presence of percentage of core involvement >25.0% and a PSA velocity of >1.01 ng/mL/year remained significant for a higher progression rate. The adjusted HR: 1.6; 95% CI [1.2-2.3], p = 0.004; adjusted HR: 1.6, 95% CI [1.2-2.4], p = 0.021, for percent of core involvement of 25.1-37.5%, and ≥37.6%, respectively. The adjusted HRs and p value associated with PSA velocity were 1.5; 95% CI [1.1-2.1], p = 0.016 and 1.6; 95% CI [1.2-2.3], p = 0.003 for PSA velocity values of 1.01-2 ng/mL per year and >2 ng/mL per year, respectively. Men who were diagnosed in regional hospital and subsequently had biopsy in metropolitan hospital were twice at risk of having Gleason upgrade compared to those whom both diagnostic and surveillance biopsies were carried out in metropolitan hospitals (adjusted HR: 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.3, p = 0.029).
When placing men on AS and considering time to histologic progression, clinicians should pay particular attention to the likely accuracy of the diagnostic specimen, their tumour stage, volume of tumour (percent of core involvement), and rising PSA. Those diagnosed with T2 disease and had >25.0% of core involvement, and a PSA velocity greater than 1 ng/mL per year is at particular risk for more rapid disease progression and, for this reason, should be counselled on the importance of following the recommended surveillance regimen. For half of these men, their disease will have 'progressed' according to biopsy results in 2 years.
本研究旨在评估:(1)在决定开始主动监测(AS)与社区实践中分级进展之间的时间间隔;(2)预测局部前列腺癌(CaP)患者在接受 AS 时出现分级进展的因素。
使用前列腺癌结果登记处-维多利亚的数据来分析至少有一次重复活检的 Gleason 3+3 CaP 或更低级别的男性。使用未经调整和调整后的 5 年 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线来评估分级进展的时间。使用 Cox 比例风险进行单变量和多变量分析以评估分级进展。
该队列包括 951 名男性。总体而言,39%的男性出现了更高风险疾病状态的 Gleason 分级改变,中位时间为 2.2 年[IQR 1.2-3.7 年]。与 T1 期患者相比,患有 cT2 疾病的男性升级的可能性增加了 30%(调整后的 HR:1.3,95%CI 1.0-1.6,p=0.048)。我们队列中一半的 cT2 患者在诊断后 1.6 年内重新分级为 Gleason 分级,而 cT1 组则为 2.7 年。核心受累百分比>25.0%和 PSA 速度>1.01ng/mL/年仍然与更高的进展率显著相关。调整后的 HR:1.6;95%CI [1.2-2.3],p=0.004;调整后的 HR:1.6,95%CI [1.2-2.4],p=0.021,分别为核心受累百分比为 25.1-37.5%和≥37.6%。与 PSA 速度相关的调整后 HR 和 p 值分别为 1.5;95%CI [1.1-2.1],p=0.016 和 1.6;95%CI [1.2-2.3],p=0.003,PSA 速度值分别为 1.01-2ng/mL/年和>2ng/mL/年。与那些同时在大都市医院进行诊断和监测活检的患者相比,在区域医院诊断并随后在大都市医院进行活检的患者出现 Gleason 升级的风险增加了两倍(调整后的 HR:1.9;95%CI 1.1-3.3,p=0.029)。
当将男性置于 AS 并考虑到组织学进展的时间时,临床医生应特别注意诊断标本的准确性、肿瘤分期、肿瘤体积(核心受累百分比)和 PSA 升高。那些诊断为 T2 疾病且核心受累>25.0%,以及 PSA 速度大于 1ng/mL/年的患者,疾病进展较快的风险尤其高,因此应告知他们遵循推荐的监测方案的重要性。对于这些患者中的一半,根据活检结果,他们的疾病将在 2 年内“进展”。