Choudhary Manish Kumar, Kolanukuduru Kaushik P, Eraky Ahmed, Mohammed Almoflihi, Tillu Neeraja, Sur Hannah, Ohayon Lianne, Venkatesh Arjun, Rangchi Arshia, Dovey Zachary, Zaytoun Osama, Buscarini Maurizio
Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, New York, USA.
School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George, Grenada.
J Endourol. 2025 Jan;39(1):57-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0601. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) have emerged as the two surgical treatments of medication-refractory benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The comparative outcomes of en-bloc HoLEP with early apical release and RASP with modified Freyer's technique remain unexplored. Between 2018 and 2022, patients with medication-refractory BPH and prostate volume ≥80 g underwent HoLEP or RASP depending on clinical characteristics, patient choice, and surgeon preference. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was performed with prostate volume and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as the matching variables to eliminate selection bias. Trifecta outcome was defined as complete urinary continence, >15 mL/second, and no postoperative complications at 3 months. After an initial univariable analysis to predict factors associated with the trifecta outcome, variables with significance levels of ≤0.1 were included in a multivariable model. Of 416 patients with medication-refractory BPH, 158 underwent HoLEP, whereas 258 underwent RASP. Following matching, 80 patients in each group were included in the analysis. There was no difference in the median postoperative IPSS score, median postoperative , and continence rate at 3 months. The percentage of patients who attained the trifecta outcome in the HoLEP and RASP groups was 71.25% and 63.75%, respectively ( = 0.4). Patients in the HoLEP group had shorter postoperative stay (HoLEP: 1 [IQR 1-2] RASP: 2 [IQR 1-2], = 0.04) and catheterization time (HoLEP: 2 [IQR 1.75-3] RASP: 5 [IQR 5-5], < 0.001). A multivariable regression did not identify any factors predictive of trifecta outcomes. Given its comparable efficacy to RASP, HoLEP is the preferred treatment for BPH in large prostates because of its shorter hospital stay and catheterization time. Future randomized controlled trials are required to solidify indications for these treatment modalities and standardize treatment protocols for patients with medication-refractory BPH.
钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)和机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术(RASP)已成为治疗药物难治性良性前列腺增生(BPH)的两种手术方式。整块HoLEP联合早期尖部松解术与采用改良弗雷尔技术的RASP的对比结果仍未得到探索。在2018年至2022年期间,药物难治性BPH且前列腺体积≥80 g的患者根据临床特征、患者选择和外科医生偏好接受了HoLEP或RASP治疗。以前列腺体积和术前国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)作为匹配变量进行1:1倾向匹配分析,以消除选择偏倚。三连胜结局定义为完全尿失禁、尿流率>15 mL/秒且术后3个月无并发症。在初步单变量分析以预测与三连胜结局相关的因素后,将显著性水平≤0.1的变量纳入多变量模型。在416例药物难治性BPH患者中,158例接受了HoLEP治疗,而258例接受了RASP治疗。匹配后,每组80例患者纳入分析。术后IPSS评分中位数、术后中位数和3个月时的尿失禁率无差异。HoLEP组和RASP组达到三连胜结局的患者百分比分别为71.25%和63.75%(P = 0.4)。HoLEP组患者术后住院时间较短(HoLEP:1天[四分位间距1 - 2天],RASP:2天[四分位间距1 - 2天],P = 0.04),导尿时间也较短(HoLEP:2天[四分位间距1.75 - 3天],RASP:5天[四分位间距5 - 5天],P < 0.001)。多变量回归未发现任何预测三连胜结局的因素。鉴于其与RASP疗效相当,HoLEP因其住院时间和导尿时间较短,是大前列腺BPH的首选治疗方法。未来需要进行随机对照试验,以明确这些治疗方式的适应证,并规范药物难治性BPH患者的治疗方案。