Jones R F
J Med Educ. 1986 Apr;61(4):273-84. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198604000-00001.
Two studies on the relationship between taking a commercial coaching course and performance on the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) are reported. In both studies, one based on repeating examinees and another based on first-time examinees, differences in scores favoring coached examinees were found on the Science Knowledge and Science Problems subtests. The results on the Skills Analysis: Quantitative subtest were mixed, while neither study found differences between the two groups in scores on the Skills Analysis: Reading subtest. The analyses further revealed that the differences in scores on the Science Knowledge and Science Problems subtests were less pronounced for examinees with low scores on the Skills Analysis: Reading and Skills Analysis: Quantitative subtests, examinees with very low or very high undergraduate grade-point averages, and examinees from very selective undergraduate colleges. The substantive importance of the differences was also explored. The coaching effect was estimated to increase an average student's probability of acceptance by 5 percentage points. The results suggest that coaching for the MCAT has a limited effect that supports rather than undermines the validity of the test.
本文报道了两项关于参加商业辅导课程与医学院入学考试(MCAT)成绩之间关系的研究。在这两项研究中,一项基于复读考生,另一项基于首次报考考生,结果发现,在科学知识和科学问题子测试中,接受辅导的考生在分数上更具优势。技能分析:定量子测试的结果喜忧参半,而两项研究均未发现两组考生在技能分析:阅读子测试的分数上存在差异。分析进一步表明,对于技能分析:阅读和技能分析:定量子测试得分较低、本科平均绩点极低或极高的考生,以及来自极具选择性的本科院校的考生而言,科学知识和科学问题子测试的分数差异并不那么明显。研究还探讨了这些差异的实质重要性。据估计,辅导效果能使普通学生被录取的概率提高5个百分点。结果表明,针对MCAT的辅导效果有限,这支持而非削弱了考试的效度。