• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任家庭医生-患者关系:嵌入理论视角。

Trust in family doctor-patient relations: an embeddedness theory perspective.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Research Center for Rural Health Service, Key Research Institute of Humanities & Social Sciences of Hubei Provincial Department of Education, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):3278. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20805-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-20805-1
PMID:39592971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11590485/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Based on the embeddedness theory, the present study aims to explore the association between patients' trust in family doctors (Interpersonal Trust), trust in community health centers (Organizational Trust), and trust in society as a whole (Social Trust).

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six community health centers in China, using partial least squares structural equation modeling to assess trust scale reliability and validity while testing hypotheses.

RESULTS

The scores of Interpersonal Trust, Organizational Trust, and Social Trust were 3.761, 3.636, and 3.635, respectively. Our findings confirm that Interpersonal Trust is positively associated with Organizational Trust (β = 0.916, p < 0.001), Organizational Trust is positively associated with Social Trust (β = 0.617, p < 0.001) and Interpersonal Trust (β = 0.864, p < 0.001), and Social Trust is positively associated with Organizational Trust (β = 0.784, p < 0.001). However, the relationship between Interpersonal Trust and Social Trust was not demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study enhances our understanding of patient trust in family doctors. Applying embeddedness theory, we reveal positive correlations between Social Trust and Organizational Trust, as well as between Organizational Trust and Interpersonal Trust. Moreover, we have identified Organizational Trust as a crucial mediator in the relationship between Interpersonal Trust and Social Trust.

摘要

背景

基于嵌入理论,本研究旨在探讨患者对家庭医生的信任(人际信任)、对社区卫生中心的信任(组织信任)和对整个社会的信任(社会信任)之间的关联。

方法

在中国的六个社区卫生中心进行了横断面调查,采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型评估信任量表的信度和效度,并检验假设。

结果

人际信任、组织信任和社会信任的得分分别为 3.761、3.636 和 3.635。我们的研究结果证实,人际信任与组织信任呈正相关(β=0.916,p<0.001),组织信任与社会信任呈正相关(β=0.617,p<0.001)和人际信任呈正相关(β=0.864,p<0.001),社会信任与组织信任呈正相关(β=0.784,p<0.001)。然而,人际信任和社会信任之间的关系没有得到证实。

结论

本研究增进了我们对患者对家庭医生信任的理解。应用嵌入理论,我们揭示了社会信任与组织信任之间以及组织信任与人际信任之间的正相关关系。此外,我们已经确定组织信任是人际信任和社会信任之间关系的关键中介。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71d6/11590485/aa570b81fda6/12889_2024_20805_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71d6/11590485/4366b015326b/12889_2024_20805_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71d6/11590485/aa570b81fda6/12889_2024_20805_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71d6/11590485/4366b015326b/12889_2024_20805_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71d6/11590485/aa570b81fda6/12889_2024_20805_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust in family doctor-patient relations: an embeddedness theory perspective.信任家庭医生-患者关系:嵌入理论视角。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):3278. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20805-1.
2
The Mediating Role of Patients' Trust Between Web-Based Health Information Seeking and Patients' Uncertainty in China: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.基于网络的健康信息搜索与中国患者不确定性之间的中介作用:基于横断面网络调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e25275. doi: 10.2196/25275.
3
The influence of patient experience and patient trust on willingness to see a doctor based on SOR theory.基于 SOR 理论的患者体验和患者信任对就诊意愿的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1278. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11775-6.
4
Association among Doctor-Patient Communication, Trust, and Patients' Negative Stereotypes for Healthcare Professionals during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study.COVID-19期间医患沟通、信任与患者对医护人员负面刻板印象之间的关联:一项横断面研究
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Dec 26;2023:5522135. doi: 10.1155/2023/5522135. eCollection 2023.
5
Rebuild doctor-patient trust in medical service delivery in China.重建中国医疗服务提供过程中的医患信任。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 15;10(1):21956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78921-y.
6
Relationship Between Internet Health Information and Patient Compliance Based on Trust: Empirical Study.基于信任的互联网健康信息与患者依从性之间的关系:实证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 17;20(8):e253. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9364.
7
The Influence of Physician Information on Patients' Choice of Physician in mHealth Services Using China's Chunyu Doctor App: Eye-Tracking and Questionnaire Study.使用春雨医生 APP 的移动医疗服务中医生信息对患者选择医生的影响:眼动追踪和问卷调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 23;7(10):e15544. doi: 10.2196/15544.
8
The relationship between organizational trust and voice behavior among neonatal intensive care unit nurses in tertiary A hospitals in Sichuan Province: the mediating role of career resilience.四川省三级甲等医院新生儿重症监护室护士组织信任与建言行为的关系:职业复原力的中介作用
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 11;12:1505641. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1505641. eCollection 2024.
9
Social embeddedness and economic opportunism: a game situation.社会嵌入性与经济机会主义:一种博弈情境
Psychol Rep. 2012 Jun;110(3):955-62. doi: 10.2466/21.02.09.17.PR0.110.3.955-962.
10
Interpersonal trust in doctor-patient relation: Evidence from dyadic analysis and association with quality of dyadic communication.医患关系中的人际信任:来自对偶分析的证据及其与对偶沟通质量的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Aug;235:112391. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112391. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Patients' Use of Telehealth Services: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.影响患者使用远程医疗服务的因素:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 10;27:e63295. doi: 10.2196/63295.
2
Preserving Continuity and Trust in Primary Care: Strategies for Implementing Team-Based Models in South Tyrol, Italy.维护基层医疗的连续性与信任:意大利南蒂罗尔实施团队模式的策略
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 23;22(4):477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040477.