Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra (UC), 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal.
Department of Psychiatry, Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (ULS-C), 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 22;60(11):1734. doi: 10.3390/medicina60111734.
: Observational studies with data from real-world clinical practice with patients with difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) are rare. This study aims to collect observational data from the real-world clinical practice of a Portuguese community mental health team (CMHT) on the prevalence of DTD and to explore differences between DTD and non-DTD groups. : We conducted a retrospective chart review study using data from Electronic Health Records (EHRs) of adult patients with psychiatric disorders followed by a CMHT from the Department of Psychiatry of the Coimbra Local Health Unit (between 1 December 2020-31 December 2022). The Dutch Measure for quantification of Treatment Resistance in Depression (DM-TRD) was used to assess the degree of treatment resistance and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to measure medical comorbidity. : A quantity of 473 patients were referred to Cantanhede CMHT for a first assessment. Of these, 219 patients met the criteria for a primary diagnosis of any depressive disorder. Assistant psychiatrists identified 57 patients with DTD during follow-up (approximately 26%). The DTD group had higher rates of depressive episodes, greater depression severity, increased service use, higher DM-TRD scores, and a higher prevalence of comorbid anxiety symptoms, personality disorders, and severe medical comorbidities. The DTD group also had a higher prescription rate of antidepressants. Differences were observed in the use of antidepressant augmentation strategies and in the prescription of anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs and analgesics, with higher prescription rates in the DTD group. We found correlations between DM-TRD and CCI scores, and between DM-TRD scores and all service use variables. : Our results are consistent with a similar study in the United Kingdom, highlighting the need for a different approach to the management of DTD patients, who continue to live with a significant burden despite usual pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.
: 针对治疗难度大的抑郁症(DTD)患者的真实临床实践的观察性研究很少。本研究旨在从葡萄牙社区心理健康团队(CMHT)的真实临床实践中收集观察性数据,以了解 DTD 的流行情况,并探讨 DTD 与非 DTD 组之间的差异。: 我们进行了一项回顾性图表审查研究,使用了 Coimbra 地方卫生单位精神病学系 CMHT 随访的成年精神障碍患者的电子健康记录(EHR)中的数据(2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日)。使用荷兰抑郁症治疗抵抗量化测量(DM-TRD)评估治疗抵抗程度,使用 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)测量医疗合并症。: 共有 473 名患者被转介到 Cantanhede CMHT 进行首次评估。其中,219 名患者符合任何抑郁障碍的主要诊断标准。助理精神科医生在随访中发现 57 名 DTD 患者(约 26%)。DTD 组的抑郁发作次数更高,抑郁严重程度更高,服务利用率更高,DM-TRD 评分更高,且合并焦虑症状、人格障碍和严重医疗合并症的患病率更高。DTD 组的抗抑郁药处方率也更高。在抗抑郁药增效策略的使用和抗凝/抗血小板药物和镇痛药的处方方面存在差异,DTD 组的处方率更高。我们发现 DM-TRD 与 CCI 评分之间存在相关性,以及 DM-TRD 评分与所有服务使用变量之间存在相关性。: 我们的结果与英国的一项类似研究一致,突出表明需要对 DTD 患者采取不同的管理方法,尽管他们接受了常规的药物和非药物治疗,但他们仍然面临着巨大的负担。