Hoeve-Bakker B J A, van den Berg Oda E, Doppenberg H S, van der Klis Fiona R M, van den Wijngaard Cees C van den, Kluytmans Jan A J W, Thijsen Steven F T, Kerkhof Karen
Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, 3552 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Microorganisms. 2024 Oct 30;12(11):2185. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12112185.
Lyme borreliosis (LB) is not notifiable in many European countries, and the patchwork of surveillance strategies in Europe perpetuates knowledge gaps. In the Netherlands, LB incidence has been estimated from recurring general practitioner surveys since the 1990s. To complement the incidence data, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of antibodies against sensu lato in the general population of the Netherlands in 1995/1996, identify risk factors for seropositivity, and compare these findings to data from 2016/2017 to identify temporal trends. Sera from participants (n = 8041, aged 0-80 years) in a cross-sectional nationwide surveillance study were assessed for the presence of antibodies against s.l., using a screening ELISA and immunoblot confirmation. Risk factors associated with seropositivity were evaluated using multivariable analysis. A significant difference in weighted seroprevalence was observed between 1995/1996 (2.8%) and 2016/2017 (4.3%). In both cohorts, the seroprevalence was significantly higher among men than among women, and increased with age and tick bite frequency. The upward trend in age-specific seropositivity in individuals over 50 was steeper in 2016/2017 than in 1995/1996, possibly due to improved fitness among contemporary elderly, allowing increased outdoor activities. This study highlights significant trends in the seroprevalence of s.l. antibodies in the general population of the Netherlands over 20 years. The doubling of seroprevalence underscores the increasing burden of LB, and the importance of continued surveillance. Targeted interventions, particularly for elderly populations, may help raise awareness to the risks of tick bites and reduce the growing disease burden and societal costs associated with LB.
莱姆病(LB)在许多欧洲国家并非法定报告疾病,欧洲监测策略的拼凑导致知识空白长期存在。在荷兰,自20世纪90年代以来,通过定期的全科医生调查来估算莱姆病发病率。为补充发病率数据,本研究旨在估算1995/1996年荷兰普通人群中抗伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种(Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato)抗体的流行率,确定血清阳性的危险因素,并将这些结果与2016/2017年的数据进行比较,以确定时间趋势。在一项全国性横断面监测研究中,对参与者(n = 8041,年龄0 - 80岁)的血清进行检测,使用筛选酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和免疫印迹确认法评估抗伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种抗体的存在情况。使用多变量分析评估与血清阳性相关的危险因素。观察到1995/1996年(2.8%)和2016/2017年(4.3%)加权血清流行率存在显著差异。在两个队列中,男性的血清流行率均显著高于女性,且随年龄和蜱叮咬频率增加而升高。2016/2017年50岁以上个体中按年龄分层的血清阳性上升趋势比1995/1996年更陡峭,这可能是由于当代老年人的健康状况改善,使得户外活动增加。本研究突出了20年来荷兰普通人群中抗伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种抗体血清流行率的显著趋势。血清流行率翻倍凸显了莱姆病负担的增加以及持续监测的重要性。有针对性的干预措施,特别是针对老年人群体,可能有助于提高对蜱叮咬风险的认识,并减少与莱姆病相关的不断增加的疾病负担和社会成本。