Bagchi Amritashish, Raizada Shiny, Thapa Rohit K, Stefanica Valentina, Ceylan Halil İbrahim
Symbiosis School of Sports Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India.
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sciences, Physical Education and Informatics, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 110040 Pitesti, Romania.
Life (Basel). 2024 Oct 29;14(11):1394. doi: 10.3390/life14111394.
Measuring countermovement jump (CMJ) height accurately is essential for evaluating lower-body explosive power in athletes and other active populations. With technological advancements, various portable tools have been developed for this purpose, including force platforms, contact mats, and video-based software. This study aimed to (a) investigate the test-retest reliability of the KINVENT K-Deltas force platform for CMJ height measurement and (b) compare its accuracy with a contact mat (Chronojump, Spain) and a video-based software (My Jump app, version 3). Twenty-two physically active collegiate athletes (mean age of 19.7 ± 1.2 years) from various sports backgrounds completed five CMJ trials with simultaneous height measurements using all three tools. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Cronbach's alpha, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated to assess reliability. In contrast, Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare device results. The K-Deltas force platform exhibited high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.981), closely matching the contact mat (ICC = 0.987) and the My Jump app (ICC = 0.986). Correlations between the instruments were strong (force platform vs. contact mat: r = 0.987; force platform vs. My Jump: r = 0.987; contact mat vs. My Jump: r = 0.996), with no between-instrument differences (-test = 0.203-0.935, effect size ≤ 0.01-0.16), demonstrating the interchangeability of these tools for practical purposes. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed limits of agreement between the devices, indicating small but consistent measurement differences. While all instruments were reliable, discrepancies in the absolute values suggest practitioners should consider device-specific variations when comparing CMJ data. These findings highlight the reliability of the K-Deltas force platform as a viable alternative for measuring CMJ height, though differences between devices should be accounted for in applied settings. Therefore, the portable force plates can monitor training, predict injury risk, assess neuromuscular fatigue, and lead to informed decision-making.
准确测量反向纵跳(CMJ)高度对于评估运动员和其他活跃人群的下肢爆发力至关重要。随着技术的进步,已开发出各种便携式工具用于此目的,包括测力平台、接触垫和基于视频的软件。本研究旨在:(a)调查KINVENT K-Deltas测力平台测量CMJ高度的重测信度;(b)将其准确性与接触垫(西班牙Chronojump)和基于视频的软件(My Jump应用程序,版本3)进行比较。来自不同运动背景的22名身体活跃的大学生运动员(平均年龄19.7±1.2岁)使用这三种工具同时进行了五次CMJ测试并测量高度。计算组内相关系数(ICC)、克朗巴哈系数和变异系数(CV)以评估信度。相比之下,使用皮尔逊相关性和布兰德-奥特曼图来比较设备结果。K-Deltas测力平台表现出较高的重测信度(ICC = 0.981),与接触垫(ICC = 0.987)和My Jump应用程序(ICC = 0.986)非常匹配。仪器之间的相关性很强(测力平台与接触垫:r = 0.987;测力平台与My Jump:r = 0.987;接触垫与My Jump:r = 0.996),仪器之间无差异(t检验 = 0.203 - 0.935,效应量≤0.01 - 0.16),表明这些工具在实际应用中具有互换性。然而,布兰德-奥特曼分析揭示了设备之间的一致性界限,表明存在虽小但一致的测量差异。虽然所有仪器都是可靠的,但绝对值的差异表明从业者在比较CMJ数据时应考虑设备特定的变化。这些发现突出了K-Deltas测力平台作为测量CMJ高度的可行替代方法的可靠性,尽管在应用环境中应考虑设备之间的差异。因此,便携式测力板可以监测训练、预测受伤风险、评估神经肌肉疲劳并有助于做出明智的决策。