Department of Physical Education, State University of Ceará-UECE, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 29;12:e18170. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18170. eCollection 2024.
Although consistently presented excellent values of reliability and validity when compared to force platforms (FPs) and contact mats, to date no scientific investigation assessed the validity and reliability of to measure jump height in visually impaired five-a-side soccer athletes. Thus, the study aimed at analyzing the validity and reliability of the to measure the vertical jump of five-a-side soccer athletes.
Twelve visually impaired five-a-side soccer athletes, volunteered for this study. Each player performed five countermovement jumps (CMJs) and squat jumps (SJs) on a contact platform (CP) while they were simultaneously recorded using .
There was almost perfect agreement between the and the contact platform measurements of CMJ (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99; < 0.001) and SJ (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99; < 0.001), heights for athletes during the first and second measurement days. analysis showed a bias of 0.25 ± 0.5 cm; maximum SD = 1.3; minimum SD = -0.88 for CMJ, while that analysis showed bias 0.18 ± 0.5 cm; maximum SD = 1.3; minimum SD = -0.96, for SJ.
We can conclude that the is a valid and reliable method to measure CMJ and SJ in visually impaired five-a-side soccer athletes.
与力台（FP）和接触垫相比，尽管 始终表现出出色的可靠性和有效性，但迄今为止，尚无科学研究评估 测量视障五人制足球运动员跳跃高度的有效性和可靠性。因此，本研究旨在分析 测量五人制足球运动员垂直跳跃的有效性和可靠性。
12 名视障五人制足球运动员自愿参加了这项研究。每位运动员在接触平台（CP）上进行了五次反向跳（CMJ）和深蹲跳（SJ），同时使用 进行记录。
与 CP 测量的 CMJ（组内相关系数=0.99；<0.001）和 SJ（组内相关系数=0.99；<0.001）高度之间几乎存在完美的一致性，运动员在第一和第二天的测量中。 分析显示偏差为 0.25±0.5cm；最大 SD=1.3；最小 SD=-0.88，用于 CMJ，而 分析显示偏差为 0.18±0.5cm；最大 SD=1.3；最小 SD=-0.96，用于 SJ。
我们可以得出结论， 是一种有效且可靠的方法，可以测量视障五人制足球运动员的 CMJ 和 SJ。
