Najdawi Wisam O, Jiang Fangfang, Zamba Gideon K D, Johnson Chris A, Pouw Andrew E
Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2025 May-Jun;8(3):213-226. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.007. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
Perimetry is a critical tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucomatous visual field defects. The Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) is a large, relatively expensive device that does not normally allow for examination outside of the clinic, and it can be ergonomically difficult to tolerate for some patients. The present study compared the novel Smart System Virtual Reality (SSVR) perimetric headset test to that of the HFA in a group of patients with glaucoma.
Prospective comparative study.
Seventy-two eyes from 36 patients with glaucoma recruited at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.
Patients completed both HFA and SSVR visual field tests on the same day, with the order of tests randomized. After completing both visual field tests, subjects completed a survey regarding their subjective experience using each perimeter. Visual fields were analyzed using a linear mixed model to assess differences between devices accounting for intereye correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.
Primary outcome measures included mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and test duration.
No statistically significant difference in MD was observed between the SSVR (-7.17 ± 6.36 dB) and HFA (-6.88 ± 6.78 dB; P = 0.859). Statistically significant differences in PSD were observed between the SSVR (4.26 ± 2.37 dB) and HFA (6.38 ± 4.51 dB; P < 0.001) and test duration (323.44 ± 72.27 seconds and 372.20 ± 61.44 seconds, respectively; P < 0.001). Subjectively, the SSVR was the preferred perimeter by 88.5% of patients.
The SSVR headset is a novel visual field testing device that produces similar results to the HFA with a shorter testing duration. The SSVR was the preferred perimeter by the majority of patients. Future study is required to determine if the SSVR can identify visual field progression.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
视野检查是诊断和监测青光眼性视野缺损的关键工具。汉弗莱视野分析仪(HFA)是一种大型、相对昂贵的设备,通常不允许在诊所外进行检查,而且对于一些患者来说,从人体工程学角度难以耐受。本研究在一组青光眼患者中比较了新型智能系统虚拟现实(SSVR)视野测试设备与HFA的性能。
前瞻性比较研究。
从爱荷华大学医院及诊所招募的36例青光眼患者的72只眼睛。
患者在同一天完成HFA和SSVR视野测试,测试顺序随机。完成两项视野测试后,受试者完成一份关于使用每种视野计的主观体验的调查问卷。使用线性混合模型分析视野数据,以评估两种设备之间的差异,并进行布兰德-奥特曼分析。
主要观察指标包括平均偏差(MD)、模式标准偏差(PSD)和测试持续时间。
SSVR(-7.17±6.36 dB)与HFA(-6.88±6.78 dB;P = 0.859)之间在MD上未观察到统计学显著差异。SSVR(4.26±2.37 dB)与HFA(6.38±4.51 dB;P < 0.001)之间以及测试持续时间(分别为323.44±72.27秒和372.20±61.44秒;P < 0.001)之间在PSD上观察到统计学显著差异。主观上,88.5%的患者更喜欢SSVR视野计。
SSVR头戴式设备是一种新型视野测试设备,其测试结果与HFA相似,但测试持续时间更短。大多数患者更喜欢SSVR视野计。需要进一步研究以确定SSVR是否能够识别视野进展情况。
作者对本文讨论的任何材料均无专利或商业利益。