Suppr超能文献

眼球捕捉器3.0——验证将“智能眼镜”作为一种低成本、便携式视野评估方法的应用

Eyecatcher 3.0 - Validating the Use of "Smart Glasses" as a Low-Cost, Portable Method of Assessing Visual Fields.

作者信息

Rathore Mehal, Reddingius Peter F, Campbell Peter, Crabb David P, Jones Pete R

机构信息

Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St. George's, University of London, London, England, UK.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5749-2761.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Aug 1;14(8):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.8.7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Glaucoma requires regular visual field (VF) assessments. Eyecatcher 3.0 uses novel "smart glasses" hardware to provide a lightweight, low-cost solution, designed for use while unsupervised. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of using Eyecatcher for VF home-monitoring.

METHODS

Eyecatcher 3.0 consists of a smartphone, smart glasses, and wireless clicker. Functionally, it attempts to mimic the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA; - same task-instructions, stimuli, and outputs, but smaller field of view and luminance range). Five patients with glaucoma used Eyecatcher to test themselves at home for 3 months (both eyes, monocular, once-per-fortnight). Results from a reduced 24-2 grid were compared to HFA data collected in the clinic, and to normative Eyecatcher data collected from 76 normally sighted young adults. A subset of normally sighted participants (n = 16) also underwent two additional sessions of follow-up testing to assess repeatability. Usability was assessed via questionnaires.

RESULTS

All Eyecatcher tests were completed successfully (100%). There was reasonable agreement with the HFA in terms of mean deviation (MD; r = 0.85, P < 0.001) and observed pattern of loss. The HFA exhibited somewhat better repeatability than Eyecatcher (MD Coefficient of Repeatability = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1-4.1 decibels [dB] for HFA, vs. 3.9, 95% CI = 2.8-6.1 dB for Eyecatcher), although this difference was not statistically significant. Average Eyecatcher test duration was 6.5 minutes (both eyes). Patients generally rated the Eyecatcher as easy-to-use, although specific concerns were raised by some individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Smart glasses may provide a feasible means of VFs home-monitoring. Eyecatcher yielded similar sensitivity values to the HFA, and most participants found the lightweight smart glasses acceptable to use. Further research is needed to establish diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

Validation of a new method of glaucoma home monitoring.

摘要

目的

青光眼需要定期进行视野(VF)评估。Eyecatcher 3.0采用新型“智能眼镜”硬件,提供一种轻便、低成本的解决方案,设计用于无人监督的情况下使用。本研究旨在确定使用Eyecatcher进行VF家庭监测的可行性。

方法

Eyecatcher 3.0由一部智能手机、智能眼镜和无线点击器组成。在功能上,它试图模仿汉弗莱视野分析仪(HFA;具有相同的任务说明、刺激和输出,但视野和亮度范围较小)。五名青光眼患者在家中使用Eyecatcher自行测试3个月(双眼、单眼,每两周一次)。将简化的24-2网格结果与在诊所收集的HFA数据以及从76名视力正常的年轻成年人收集的Eyecatcher规范数据进行比较。一部分视力正常的参与者(n = 16)还进行了另外两次随访测试,以评估重复性。通过问卷调查评估可用性。

结果

所有Eyecatcher测试均成功完成(100%)。在平均偏差(MD;r = 0.85,P < 0.001)和观察到的视野缺损模式方面,与HFA有合理的一致性。HFA的重复性略优于Eyecatcher(HFA的MD重复性系数 = 2.9,95%置信区间[CI] = 从2.1至4.1分贝[dB],而Eyecatcher为3.9,95%CI = 2.8至6.1 dB),尽管这种差异无统计学意义。Eyecatcher平均测试时长为6.5分钟(双眼)。患者普遍认为Eyecatcher易于使用,不过一些人也提出了具体担忧。

结论

智能眼镜可能为VF家庭监测提供一种可行的方法。Eyecatcher产生的敏感性值与HFA相似,大多数参与者认为这种轻便的智能眼镜可以接受。需要进一步研究以确定其诊断准确性和临床实用性。

转化相关性

青光眼家庭监测新方法的验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb80/12327542/59a6638bbc7e/tvst-14-8-7-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验