Suppr超能文献

长新冠(新冠后状况)管理的干预措施:系统综述。

Interventions for the management of long covid (post-covid condition): living systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 2024 Nov 27;387:e081318. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081318.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of interventions for the management of long covid (post-covid condition).

DESIGN

Living systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to December 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Trials that randomised adults (≥18 years) with long covid to drug or non-drug interventions, placebo or sham, or usual care.

RESULTS

24 trials with 3695 patients were eligible. Four trials (n=708 patients) investigated drug interventions, eight (n=985) physical activity or rehabilitation, three (n=314) behavioural, four (n=794) dietary, four (n=309) medical devices and technologies, and one (n=585) a combination of physical exercise and mental health rehabilitation. Moderate certainty evidence suggested that, compared with usual care, an online programme of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) probably reduces fatigue (mean difference -8.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.11 to -3.69; Checklist for Individual Strength fatigue subscale; range 8-56, higher scores indicate greater impairment) and probably improves concentration (mean difference -5.2, -7.97 to -2.43; Checklist for Individual Strength concentration problems subscale; range 4-28; higher scores indicate greater impairment). Moderate certainty evidence suggested that, compared with usual care, an online, supervised, combined physical and mental health rehabilitation programme probably leads to improvement in overall health, with an estimated 161 more patients per 1000 (95% CI 61 more to 292 more) experiencing meaningful improvement or recovery, probably reduces symptoms of depression (mean difference -1.50, -2.41 to -0.59; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression subscale; range 0-21; higher scores indicate greater impairment), and probably improves quality of life (0.04, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.08; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29+2 Profile; range -0.022-1; higher scores indicate less impairment). Moderate certainty evidence suggested that intermittent aerobic exercise 3-5 times weekly for 4-6 weeks probably improves physical function compared with continuous exercise (mean difference 3.8, 1.12 to 6.48; SF-36 physical component summary score; range 0-100; higher scores indicate less impairment). No compelling evidence was found to support the effectiveness of other interventions, including, among others, vortioxetine, leronlimab, combined probiotics-prebiotics, coenzyme Q10, amygdala and insula retraining, combined L-arginine and vitamin C, inspiratory muscle training, transcranial direct current stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen, a mobile application providing education on long covid.

CONCLUSION

Moderate certainty evidence suggests that CBT and physical and mental health rehabilitation probably improve symptoms of long covid.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9h7zm/.

READERS' NOTE: This article is a living systematic review that will be updated to reflect emerging evidence. Updates may occur for up to two years from the date of original publication.

摘要

目的

比较管理长新冠(新冠后状况)的干预措施的效果。

设计

实时系统评价。

资料来源

从创建到 2023 年 12 月,在 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、补充和综合医学数据库以及 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中检索了 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、补充和综合医学数据库以及 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。

入选标准

随机分配长新冠成年患者(≥18 岁)接受药物或非药物干预、安慰剂或假对照、或常规护理的试验。

结果

24 项试验共纳入 3695 名患者。四项试验(n=708 名患者)调查了药物干预,八项试验(n=985 名患者)调查了体力活动或康复,三项试验(n=314 名患者)调查了行为干预,四项试验(n=794 名患者)调查了饮食干预,四项试验(n=309 名患者)调查了医疗设备和技术,一项试验(n=585 名患者)调查了体力锻炼和心理健康康复的联合干预。中等确定性证据表明,与常规护理相比,在线认知行为疗法(CBT)方案可能会减轻疲劳(平均差异-8.4,95%置信区间[CI]为-13.11 至-3.69;Checklist for Individual Strength 疲劳子量表;范围为 8-56,分数越高表示损伤越大),可能改善注意力集中(平均差异-5.2,-7.97 至-2.43;Checklist for Individual Strength 注意力集中问题子量表;范围为 4-28;分数越高表示损伤越大)。中等确定性证据表明,与常规护理相比,在线监督的身心康复联合方案可能会改善整体健康,估计每 1000 名患者中就有 161 名(95%CI 为 61 至 292 名)有意义地改善或康复,可能会减轻抑郁症状(平均差异-1.50,-2.41 至-0.59;医院焦虑和抑郁量表抑郁子量表;范围为 0-21;分数越高表示损伤越大),可能改善生活质量(0.04,95%CI 为 0.00 至 0.08;患者报告的结果测量信息系统 29+2 概况;范围为-0.022 至 1;分数越高表示损伤越小)。中等确定性证据表明,间歇性有氧运动每周 3-5 次,持续 4-6 周,与连续运动相比,可能会改善身体功能(平均差异 3.8,1.12 至 6.48;SF-36 身体成分综合评分;范围为 0-100;分数越高表示损伤越小)。没有确凿证据支持其他干预措施的有效性,包括文拉法辛、leronlimab、益生菌-益生元联合用药、辅酶 Q10、杏仁核和脑岛再训练、L-精氨酸和维生素 C 联合用药、吸气肌训练、经颅直流电刺激、高压氧、提供长新冠教育的移动应用程序。

结论

中等确定性证据表明,CBT 和身心康复可能会改善长新冠的症状。

系统评价注册

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9h7zm/。

读者注意事项

本文是一个实时系统评价,将根据新出现的证据进行更新。从原始出版物日期起,最多可能会更新两年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e02/11600537/115fb44be587/zerd081318.f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验