Baerthlein W C, Moodley S, Stinson S K
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;67(4):594-7.
The present study examines the incidence of maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with delivery from the midpelvis using the vacuum extractor when compared with obstetric forceps. Previous studies have failed to minimize the influence of confounding variables such as maternal and neonatal disease and indication for delivery on outcome when comparing determinants of maternal and neonatal morbidity in the two groups. Results indicate that there was significantly more maternal morbidity in forceps deliveries across most variables. There were no statistically significant differences in neonatal morbidity between the two groups except for a higher incidence of inconsequential cephalhematoma in the vacuum group. It is concluded that the vacuum extractor may be a valuable instrument in delivery from the midpelvis and that it should be more widely used in appropriate clinical situations.
本研究探讨了与使用真空吸引器经中骨盆分娩相关的孕产妇和新生儿发病率,与产科产钳进行了对比。以往的研究在比较两组孕产妇和新生儿发病率的决定因素时,未能将诸如孕产妇和新生儿疾病以及分娩指征等混杂变量对结果的影响降至最低。结果表明,在大多数变量方面,产钳分娩的孕产妇发病率显著更高。两组之间的新生儿发病率无统计学显著差异,但真空吸引器组的无关紧要的头皮血肿发生率较高。结论是,真空吸引器可能是经中骨盆分娩的一种有价值的器械,应在适当的临床情况下更广泛地使用。