Achanna S, Monga D
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, General Hospital, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Singapore Med J. 1994 Dec;35(6):605-8.
The outcome of 100 patients undergoing instrumental delivery with vacuum extractor is compared with that of 100 women delivered with the aid of obstetric forceps. Forceps deliveries were more commonly associated with maternal birth canal trauma (including episiotomy) whilst vacuum extractor carried higher odds of the neonate developing jaundice. Apart from these, there were no significant differences between these two groups in terms of maternal morbidity, neonatal trauma and morbidity and ultimate outcome (success with the type of instrument used). We conclude that with meticulous handling of the instrument and with an appropriate decision on the indication and the type of instrument used, the maternal and neonatal outcome could be equally good with the use of either instrument.
将100例行真空吸引器助产分娩的患者的结局与100例借助产钳分娩的产妇的结局进行比较。产钳分娩更常与产妇产道损伤(包括会阴切开术)相关,而真空吸引器助产则使新生儿发生黄疸的几率更高。除此之外,在产妇发病率、新生儿创伤及发病率以及最终结局(使用器械类型的成功率)方面,这两组之间没有显著差异。我们得出结论,通过对器械的精心操作以及对适应证和所用器械类型做出恰当决策,使用这两种器械中的任何一种,母婴结局都可能同样良好。