Swendeman Dallas, Rotheram-Borus Mary Jane, Arnold Elizabeth Mayfield, Fernández Maria Isabel, Comulada W Scott, Ishimoto Kelsey, Gertsch William, Murphy Debra A, Ocasio Manuel, Lee Sung-Jae, Lewis Katherine A
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, 760 Westwood Plaza, Suite 37-360A, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2025 Feb;29(2):626-641. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04545-2. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
Sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) are vulnerable to acquiring HIV and need HIV prevention and health services, but may have competing needs. A prior analysis found that PrEP use reports increased in a combination intervention study arm with coaching, peer support, and automated text-messages. This paper examines ancillary support and healthcare services utilization as secondary intervention objectives. SGMY (N = 895, 40% Black, 29% Latino) in Los Angeles and New Orleans were recruited from May, 2017 to August, 2019 and randomized to four intervention conditions: (a) automated text-messaging and monitoring intervention (AMMI), (b) AMMI plus peer support online (AMMI+PS), (c) AMMI plus strengths-based coaching by near-peer paraprofessionals (AMMI+C), or (d) all three (AMMI+PS+C). Intent-to-treat multivariate regression analyses evaluated the interventions' efficacy on past 4-month reports of ancillary support services use, having a regular healthcare provider, receiving care from doctor's office or clinic and mental health specialists, and participation in mental health support groups and HIV prevention programs. Ancillary services utilization reports declined from 40% of youth reporting an average of 4.4 services at baseline to 22.6% reporting 2.5 services by 24 months. Food, housing, transportation, and other basic services were utilized most frequently. Youth in the two coaching interventions maintained higher reports of services use over time compared to AMMI-only (both OR 1.23, 95%CI 1.12-1.35) and to AMMI+PS (both OR 1.20 95%CI 1.08-1.33). Our coaching intervention may support SGMY to stay engaged in support services. Results may be limited by self-report biases. It is unclear if these services are related to better long-term outcomes.
性取向和性别少数青年(SGMY)易感染艾滋病毒,需要艾滋病毒预防和健康服务,但可能有相互冲突的需求。先前的一项分析发现,在一项结合了辅导、同伴支持和自动短信的综合干预研究组中,暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用报告有所增加。本文将辅助支持和医疗服务利用情况作为次要干预目标进行研究。2017年5月至2019年8月,在洛杉矶和新奥尔良招募了SGMY(N = 895,40%为黑人,29%为拉丁裔),并将其随机分为四种干预条件:(a)自动短信和监测干预(AMMI),(b)AMMI加在线同伴支持(AMMI+PS),(c)AMMI加由近同伴准专业人员提供的基于优势的辅导(AMMI+C),或(d)三者皆有(AMMI+PS+C)。意向性治疗多变量回归分析评估了干预措施对过去4个月辅助支持服务使用报告、拥有常规医疗服务提供者、从医生办公室或诊所及心理健康专家处接受治疗以及参与心理健康支持小组和艾滋病毒预防项目的效果。辅助服务利用报告从基线时40%的青年平均报告使用4.4项服务下降到24个月时22.6%的青年报告使用2.5项服务。食品、住房、交通和其他基本服务的使用最为频繁。随着时间的推移,与仅接受AMMI干预的青年(两者的比值比均为1.23,95%置信区间为1.12 - 1.35)以及接受AMMI+PS干预的青年(两者的比值比均为1.20,95%置信区间为1.08 - 1.33)相比,接受两种辅导干预的青年对服务使用的报告维持在较高水平。我们的辅导干预可能有助于SGMY持续参与支持服务。结果可能受到自我报告偏差的限制。目前尚不清楚这些服务是否与更好的长期结果相关。