Gresham G E, Labi M L, Dittmar S S, Hicks J T, Joyce S Z, Stehlik M A
Paraplegia. 1986 Feb;24(1):38-44. doi: 10.1038/sc.1986.7.
The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF) was originally developed by the authors in 1980 because the popular Barthel Index was deemed too insensitive to document the small but significant functional gains made by quadriplegics (tetraplegics) during medical rehabilitation. The QIF has now been tested on a group of 30 complete quadriplegic patients at admission to and discharge from inpatient medical rehabilitation. Resultant scores were compared to those simultaneously obtained by the Barthel Index and the Kenny Self-Care Evaluation. The QIF was found to be more sensitive (46 per cent improvement as opposed to 30 per cent by the Kenny Self Care Evaluation and 20 per cent by the Barthel Index). The QIF was also tested for reliability. Ratings by three different nurses, working independently, were found to be significantly positively correlated for all sub-scores (p less than .001). We conclude that the QIF provides a useful option in choosing a functional assessment instrument for use with quadriplegic patients.
四肢瘫痪功能指数(QIF)最初由作者于1980年制定,因为当时普遍使用的巴氏指数被认为对记录四肢瘫痪患者(四肢麻痹患者)在医学康复期间取得的微小但显著的功能改善不够敏感。QIF现已在30名完全性四肢瘫痪患者入院和出院时进行了测试。将所得分数与同时通过巴氏指数和肯尼自理评估获得的分数进行比较。结果发现QIF更敏感(改善率为46%,而肯尼自理评估为30%,巴氏指数为20%)。还对QIF的可靠性进行了测试。发现三名独立工作的不同护士的评分在所有子分数上均呈显著正相关(p小于0.001)。我们得出结论,QIF为选择用于四肢瘫痪患者的功能评估工具提供了一个有用的选项。