Suppr超能文献

质量保证和质量控制流程:代谢组学社区调查问卷总结

Quality assurance and quality control processes: Summary of a metabolomics community questionnaire.

作者信息

Dunn Warwick B, Broadhurst David I, Edison Arthur, Guillou Claude, Viant Mark R, Bearden Daniel W, Beger Richard D

机构信息

School of Biosciences and Phenome Centre Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6017, Perth, Western Australia.

出版信息

Metabolomics. 2017 May;13(5). doi: 10.1007/s11306-017-1188-9. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Metabolomics Society Data Quality Task Group (DQTG) developed a questionnaire regarding quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) to provide baseline information about current QA and QC practices applied in the international metabolomics community.

OBJECTIVES

The DQTG has a long-term goal of promoting robust QA and QC in the metabolomics community through increased awareness via communication, outreach and education, and through the promotion of best working practices. An assessment of current QA and QC practices will serve as a foundation for future activities and development of appropriate guidelines.

METHOD

QA was defined as the set of procedures that are performed in advance of analysis of samples and that are used to improve data quality. QC was defined as the set of activities that a laboratory does during or immediately after analysis that are applied to demonstrate the quality of project data. A questionnaire was developed that included 70 questions covering demographic information, QA approaches and QC approaches and allowed all respondents to answer a subset or all of the questions.

RESULT

The DQTG questionnaire received 97 individual responses from 84 institutions in all fields of metabolomics covering NMR, LC-MS, GC-MS, and other analytical technologies.

CONCLUSION

There was a vast range of responses concerning the use of QA and QC approaches that indicated the limited availability of suitable training, lack of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to review and make decisions on quality, and limited use of standard reference materials (SRMs) as QC materials. The DQTG QA/QC questionnaire has for the first time demonstrated that QA and QC usage is not uniform across metabolomics laboratories. Here we present recommendations on how to address the issues concerning QA and QC measurements and reporting in metabolomics.

摘要

引言

代谢组学协会数据质量任务组(DQTG)编制了一份关于质量保证(QA)和质量控制(QC)的调查问卷,以提供有关国际代谢组学领域当前应用的QA和QC实践的基线信息。

目标

DQTG的长期目标是通过沟通、宣传和教育提高认识,并推广最佳工作实践,从而在代谢组学领域促进强有力的QA和QC。对当前QA和QC实践的评估将为未来活动和制定适当指南奠定基础。

方法

QA被定义为在样本分析之前执行的一组程序,用于提高数据质量。QC被定义为实验室在分析期间或分析后立即进行的一组活动,用于证明项目数据的质量。编制了一份包含70个问题的调查问卷,涵盖人口统计信息、QA方法和QC方法,并允许所有受访者回答部分或所有问题。

结果

DQTG调查问卷收到了来自代谢组学各个领域84个机构的97份个人回复,涵盖核磁共振(NMR)、液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS)、气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)和其他分析技术。

结论

关于QA和QC方法的使用存在广泛的回复,这表明合适培训的可用性有限、缺乏用于审查和做出质量决策的标准操作规程(SOP),以及作为QC材料的标准参考物质(SRM)使用有限。DQTG的QA/QC调查问卷首次表明,QA和QC的使用在代谢组学实验室中并不统一。在此,我们提出了关于如何解决代谢组学中QA和QC测量及报告相关问题的建议。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome.酵母基因组的系统功能分析。
Trends Biotechnol. 1998 Sep;16(9):373-8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(98)01214-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验