Kamble Prathamesh H, Agarwal Akshat, Hedaoo Ashwini, Phatak Mrunal
Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):e72516. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72516. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Shift work is essential in health care because of the need for 24-hour services but it is associated with adverse health outcomes, including disrupted circadian rhythms, poor sleep, unhealthy dietary habits, and increased stress. These effects may differ across job categories, such as nursing officers and hospital support staff, owing to varying physical and psychological demands. Limited research exists on how shift work impacts these groups differently, particularly regarding readiness to change unhealthy lifestyle behaviors.
This study aims to assess and compare lifestyle factors across six domains - nutrition, physical activity, sleep, stress, social relationships, and addictions - between hospital support staff and nursing officers with rotating shifts versus fixed daytime duties. It also aims to evaluate the association between readiness to change lifestyle patterns and work type and determine the influence of job category and shift type on lifestyle parameters after adjusting for confounders such as demographics and body composition.
A case-control study was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Nagpur from December 2023 to June 2024. The study involved 327 participants (165 cases and 162 controls) comprising nurses and hospital support staff, aged 21-45 years. The case group included 83 nurses and 84 hospital support staff working rotating shifts for at least three years, while the control group consisted of 81 nurses and 81 staff members with fixed daytime schedules. General assessments, including demographics, body composition (InBody 770), and lifestyle assessments across nutrition, physical activity, sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; PSQI), stress (Perceived Stress Scale; PSS-10), social connectivity (Social Support Questionnaire), and alcohol use (a modified version of the 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C)) were performed. Readiness to change lifestyle behaviors was assessed using the stages of the change model.
Shift workers had a significantly higher body weight (p = 0.030), larger waist circumference (p = 0.029), and higher calorie intake (p = 0.043) than non-shift workers. They also exhibited lower cardiovascular fitness (p = 0.021) and reduced water intake (p = 0.043). Among the nursing officers, shift workers had significantly poorer sleep quality (p = 0.003) and higher calorie intake (p = 0.046). Stress levels were paradoxically lower among shift nurses (p = 0.025) but not among support staff. Readiness to change lifestyle behaviors did not differ significantly between shift and non-shift workers across all domains. Logistic regression showed that sleep quality was significantly associated with shift work among nursing officers (odds ratio (OR): 6.503, p = 0.038), while no significant associations were found for other lifestyle parameters.
This study highlights the adverse effects of shift work on body composition, calorie intake, cardiovascular fitness, and sleep quality among hospital workers, particularly nursing officers. Despite these health risks, readiness to change lifestyle behaviors was similar between shift and non-shift workers, suggesting that shift work may not directly influence the motivation for lifestyle changes. These findings underscore the need for tailored interventions targeting specific health challenges of shift workers to improve their overall well-being and productivity.
由于医疗保健需要提供24小时服务,轮班工作至关重要,但它与不良健康后果相关,包括昼夜节律紊乱、睡眠不佳、不健康的饮食习惯和压力增加。由于身体和心理需求不同,这些影响在不同工作类别中可能有所差异,例如护士和医院辅助人员。关于轮班工作如何对这些群体产生不同影响的研究有限,特别是在改变不健康生活方式行为的意愿方面。
本研究旨在评估和比较医院辅助人员和轮班护士与固定白班护士在营养、身体活动、睡眠、压力、社会关系和成瘾六个领域的生活方式因素。它还旨在评估改变生活方式模式的意愿与工作类型之间的关联,并在调整人口统计学和身体成分等混杂因素后,确定工作类别和轮班类型对生活方式参数的影响。
2023年12月至2024年6月在那格浦尔全印度医学科学研究所(AIIMS)进行了一项病例对照研究。该研究涉及327名参与者(165例和162例对照),包括年龄在21 - 45岁的护士和医院辅助人员。病例组包括83名护士和84名医院辅助人员,他们轮班工作至少三年,而对照组由81名护士和81名固定白班的工作人员组成。进行了一般评估,包括人口统计学、身体成分(InBody 770)以及营养、身体活动、睡眠(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数;PSQI)、压力(感知压力量表;PSS - 10)、社会联系(社会支持问卷)和饮酒情况(10项酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT - C)的修改版)等生活方式评估。使用改变模型的阶段来评估改变生活方式行为的意愿。
轮班工作者的体重(p = 0.030)、腰围(p = 0.029)和卡路里摄入量(p = 0.043)显著高于非轮班工作者。他们还表现出较低的心血管健康水平(p = 0.021)和较低的水摄入量(p = 0.043)。在护士中,轮班工作者的睡眠质量显著较差(p = 0.003)且卡路里摄入量较高(p = 0.046)。轮班护士的压力水平反而较低(p = 0.025),但医院辅助人员中并非如此。在所有领域,轮班工作者和非轮班工作者改变生活方式行为的意愿没有显著差异。逻辑回归显示,睡眠质量与护士中的轮班工作显著相关(优势比(OR):6.503,p = 0.038),而其他生活方式参数未发现显著关联。
本研究强调了轮班工作对医院工作人员,特别是护士的身体成分、卡路里摄入量、心血管健康和睡眠质量的不利影响。尽管存在这些健康风险,轮班工作者和非轮班工作者改变生活方式行为的意愿相似,这表明轮班工作可能不会直接影响改变生活方式的动机。这些发现强调了针对轮班工作者特定健康挑战的量身定制干预措施的必要性,以提高他们的整体幸福感和工作效率。