• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究电子健康记录在免疫接种中的评估指标验证:德尔菲技术。

Study for the validation of evaluation indicators of electronic health records in immunization: Delphi technique.

机构信息

Escola de Saúde Pública da Bahia Profº Jorge Novis. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Universidade do Estado da Bahia. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Nov 22;77(5):e20230112. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0112. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0112
PMID:39607190
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11653872/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate indicators for the evaluation of computerized systems in vaccination rooms.

METHODS

Methodological study. From the construction of a logical model for managing information produced in computerized systems in vaccination rooms, an evaluation indicator matrix was developed, and its contents were validated by specialists using the Delphi method. The degree of relevance and clarity were judged, using the following parameters: agreement percentage ≥ 90%; content validity index > 0.78. Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.93.

RESULTS

Of the 55 proposed indicators, 48 were validated and composed the final matrix, with 13 in the structure dimension, 29 in the process dimension, and six in the outcome dimension.

CONCLUSION

The set of indicators shows validity and high reliability, and can be used to evaluate computerized systems in vaccination rooms throughout the country, as it adhered to the recommendations of the National Immunization Program.

摘要

目的

制定和验证用于评估接种室计算机系统的指标。

方法

方法学研究。从构建接种室计算机系统中产生的信息管理逻辑模型出发,开发了一个评估指标矩阵,并使用德尔菲法由专家对其内容进行验证。使用以下参数判断相关性和清晰度:协议百分比≥90%;内容有效性指数>0.78。使用 0.93 的 Cronbach 的 alpha 系数测试内部一致性。

结果

在所提出的 55 个指标中,有 48 个得到了验证,并组成了最终的矩阵,其中结构维度有 13 个指标,过程维度有 29 个指标,结果维度有 6 个指标。

结论

该指标集具有有效性和高可靠性,可用于评估全国范围内接种室的计算机系统,因为它符合国家免疫计划的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/6a59d1316033/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/84d787505396/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/550601e057a7/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/e3558330431c/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/6a59d1316033/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/84d787505396/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/550601e057a7/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/e3558330431c/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ce2/11653872/6a59d1316033/0034-7167-reben-77-05-e20230112-gf04.jpg

相似文献

1
Study for the validation of evaluation indicators of electronic health records in immunization: Delphi technique.研究电子健康记录在免疫接种中的评估指标验证:德尔菲技术。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Nov 22;77(5):e20230112. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0112. eCollection 2024.
2
[Construction of a risk assessment indicator system for re-establishment of imported malaria].[输入性疟疾复燃风险评估指标体系的构建]
Zhongguo Xue Xi Chong Bing Fang Zhi Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 12;34(2):163-171. doi: 10.16250/j.32.1374.2022023.
3
[Development and validation of performance indicators of the National School Food Program management].[国家学校供餐计划管理绩效指标的制定与验证]
Cien Saude Colet. 2022 Jan;27(1):335-349. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232022271.35782020. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
4
Developing and validating key performance indicators for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programs: a literature review and Delphi survey.制定和验证乳腺癌、宫颈癌及结直肠癌筛查项目的关键绩效指标:一项文献综述与德尔菲调查
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;13:1491226. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1491226. eCollection 2025.
5
Validation of an evaluation matrix for the nursing process in the hospital context.验证医院环境下护理流程的评估矩阵。
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2024 Jul 5;45(spe1):e20230254. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230254.en. eCollection 2024.
6
Indicators of effectiveness of nursing care in the dimension of patient safety.护理在患者安全维度的有效性指标。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Apr 22;73(3):e20180833. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0833. eCollection 2020.
7
Adolescent mothers, self-care and childcare: content validation of an Event History Calendar.青少年母亲、自我护理和育儿:事件历史日历的内容验证。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023 Mar 31;57:e20220314. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0314en. eCollection 2023.
8
Development of the competency assessment scale for clinical nursing teachers: Results of a Delphi study and validation.临床护理教师能力评估量表的开发:德尔菲研究和验证结果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jun;101:104876. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104876. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Design and content validation of an instrument measuring user perception of the persuasive design principles in a breastfeeding mHealth app: A modified Delphi study.测量母乳喂养移动健康应用程序中用户对劝导设计原则感知的工具的设计和内容验证:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Aug;164:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104789. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Development of quality indicators for hypertension, extractable from the electronic health record of the general practitioner: a rand-modified Delphi method.高血压质量指标的开发,可从全科医生的电子健康记录中提取:一项随机修正 Delphi 法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 15;25(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02543-w.

本文引用的文献

1
The Brazilian National Immunization Program: 46 years of achievements and challenges.巴西国家免疫计划:46 年的成就与挑战。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Oct 26;36Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e00222919. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00222919. eCollection 2020.
2
An assessment of the quality of vaccination data produced through smart paper technology in The Gambia.冈比亚智能纸张技术生产的疫苗接种数据质量评估。
Vaccine. 2020 Sep 29;38(42):6618-6626. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.074. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
3
Structural and procedural conditions in National Immunization Program Information System establishment.
国家免疫规划信息系统建立的结构和程序条件。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(4):e20180939. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0939. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Factors limiting data quality in the expanded programme on immunization in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review.中低收入国家扩大免疫规划中数据质量的限制因素:范围综述。
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 19;38(30):4652-4663. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.091. Epub 2020 May 20.
5
Assessing electronic immunization registries: the Pan American Health Organization experience.评估电子免疫登记系统:泛美卫生组织的经验。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019 Mar 15;43:e28. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2019.28. eCollection 2019.
6
Assessment of select electronic health information systems that support immunization data capture - Kenya, 2017.评估支持免疫数据采集的特定电子健康信息系统 - 肯尼亚,2017 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3435-9.
7
Immunization information systems to increase vaccination rates: a community guide systematic review.免疫信息系统以提高疫苗接种率:社区指南系统评价
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):227-48. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000069.
8
[Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments].[测量工具开发与改编过程中的内容效度]
Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Jul;16(7):3061-8. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000800006.
9
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
10
Quality assessment and monitoring. Retrospect and prospect.质量评估与监测。回顾与展望。
Eval Health Prof. 1983 Sep;6(3):363-75. doi: 10.1177/016327878300600309.