Flannery Layne, Compton Heidi R, Dascombe Ben J, West Millicent A, Secomb Josh L
Applied Sports Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Jan;25(1):e12219. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12219. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
Field-based team sports typically perform mixed-modality training, incorporating both field- and resistance-based sessions. As such, the availability of useful and reliable methods to monitor the internal and external training loads of all modalities is essential for planning effective training. Twenty-one junior developmental female rugby league athletes (age: 17.5 ± 0.5 years, height: 167.7 ± 4.6 cm, body mass: 71.1 ± 12.9 kg, and training age: 2.3 ± 1.1 year) performed two to three resistance training sessions a week for 20 weeks (9 weeks preseason and 11 weeks in-season). The volume load method and session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) were used to quantify the external and internal load of the resistance training sessions, respectively. Volume load was categorised into either dynamic, plyometric, maximal or repeated efforts. Multiple linear mixed models were performed to determine whether significant relationships were present between the changes in volume load components and sRPE throughout the season. Significant relationships were identified between a decrease in sRPE, with associated increases in absolute and relative overall volume load (T = -2.1, p = 0.04; T = -2.2, p = 0.03), and relative dynamic (T = -8.4, p < 0.01) and lower-body plyometric efforts (T = -17.2, p < 0.01). Conversely, significant relationships were observed between an increase in sRPE, with associated increases in relative lower-body (T = 12.9, p < 0.01) and upper-body repeated efforts (T = 9.7, p = 0.03) as well as relative upper-body plyometric (T = 2.9, p = 0.01) and maximal efforts (T = 3.4, p < 0.01). These findings highlight the practicality of the volume load method for planning and monitoring resistance training in field-based team sport athletes, providing useful data for the planning of specific exercises within the in-season training week.
以场地为基础的团队运动通常进行混合模式训练,包括基于场地和基于阻力的训练课程。因此,拥有有用且可靠的方法来监测所有模式的内部和外部训练负荷对于规划有效的训练至关重要。21名青少年女子橄榄球联盟发展球员(年龄:17.5±0.5岁,身高:167.7±4.6厘米,体重:71.1±12.9千克,训练年限:2.3±1.1年)每周进行两到三次阻力训练课程,共持续20周(季前赛9周,赛季中11周)。分别使用训练量负荷法和主观用力程度训练课评分(sRPE)来量化阻力训练课程的外部和内部负荷。训练量负荷分为动态、增强式、最大或重复用力。进行多元线性混合模型分析,以确定整个赛季训练量负荷组成部分的变化与sRPE之间是否存在显著关系。结果发现,sRPE降低与绝对和相对总训练量负荷增加相关(T = -2.1,p = 0.04;T = -2.2,p = 0.03),以及相对动态训练量负荷(T = -8.4,p < 0.01)和下肢增强式用力(T = -17.2,p < 0.01)之间存在显著关系。相反,观察到sRPE增加与相对下肢(T = 12.9,p < 0.01)和上肢重复用力(T = 9.7,p = 0.03)以及相对上肢增强式用力(T = 2.9,p = 0.01)和最大用力(T = 3.4,p < 0.01)增加相关。这些发现突出了训练量负荷法在规划和监测以场地为基础的团队运动运动员阻力训练方面的实用性,为赛季中训练周内特定练习的规划提供了有用数据。