Impact of a Text Messaging Intervention as an In-Between Support to Diabetes Group Visits in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Cluster Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND

In the United States, 1 in 11 people receive primary care from a federally qualified health center (FQHC). Text messaging interventions (TMIs) are accessible ways to deliver health information, engage patients, and improve health outcomes in the health center setting.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the impact of a TMI implemented with a group visit (GV) intervention among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at FQHCs on patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes based on patient TMI engagement.

METHODS

A TMI was implemented for 11 health centers participating in a cluster randomized study of diabetes GVs in Midwestern FQHCs targeting adults with T2DM. FQHC patients participated in 6 monthly GVs either in person or online and a concurrent 25-week TMI. Outcome measures included clinical markers such as glycated hemoglobin A1c and patient-reported diabetes distress, diabetes self-care, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes care knowledge, diabetes quality of life, diabetes social support, and TMI use and satisfaction. TMI response rate was calculated as responses to an SMS text message requesting a response divided by total messages requesting a response sent. Patients were grouped as high responders if their response rate was greater than or equal to the median response rate and low responders if their response rate was below the median. We conducted linear mixed models to compare high and low responders and within a group, adjusting for age, gender, GV attendance, and depression/anxiety at baseline.

RESULTS

In total, 101 of 124 GV patients (81.5%) enrolled in the TMI. The average age of the population in the TMI was 53 years. Of the 101 respondents, 61 (60%) were racial or ethnic minorities, while 42 of 82 respondents (51%) had a high school diploma/General Education Development or less, and 56 of 80 respondents (71%) reported an annual income less than US $30,000. In addition, 70 of 81 respondents (86%) owned a smartphone and 74 of 80 respondents (93%) had an unlimited texting plan. The median response rate was 41% and the mean response rate was 41.6%. Adjusted models showed significantly improved diabetes knowledge (P<.001), foot care (P<.001), and exercise (P=.002) in high responders (n=34) compared to low responders (n=23) at 6 months. No group difference was found in glycated hemoglobin A1c. Within high responders, diabetes distress (P=.001), social support (P<.001), quality of life (P<.001), diabetes knowledge (P<.001), foot care (P<.001), and diet (P=.003) improved from baseline to 6 months. Low responders only improved in diabetes quality of life (P=.003) from baseline to 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In a FQHC safety net population participating in a combined TMI and GV intervention, our study showed improved diabetes distress, social support, knowledge, self-care, self-efficacy, and quality of life among patients highly engaged in the SMS text messaging program.