• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Stakeholders and their perspectives on perinatal depression screening: a systematic review.

作者信息

Wang Ting, Yang Yating, Zhang Shuyong, Yuan Yifei, Guo Hanyu, Fang Sitong, Ji Yan, Tong Jiancheng, Wang Yu, Li Yizhuo, Yin Juan

机构信息

School of nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China.

School of nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2024 Nov-Dec;91:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.009
PMID:39608223
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Untreated perinatal depression significantly affects the health outcomes of both mothers and infants and increases the economic burden on families and society. Early depression screening to identify at-risk women is essential, and involving key stakeholders ensures the successful integration of best practices within healthcare settings.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims are: 1) to identify stakeholders from guidelines and studies that influence the implementation of perinatal depression screening; and 2) to provide a thematic summary of stakeholders' perspectives on the opportunities and challenges for scaling perinatal depression screening.

METHODS

A total of 10 databases were comprehensively searched from their inception until July 28 in 2024, encompassing both Chinese and English literature. Websites of academic organizations were also explored to obtain guidelines pertaining to perinatal depression screening. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Stakeholders' perspectives were analyzed using second-order thematic qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3268 original articles and 104 guidelines were retrieved. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 57 original studies and 9 guidelines for data analysis. The most commonly mentioned stakeholders in perinatal depression screening were health care workers (n = 48) and perinatal women (n = 32), followed by healthcare leaders/managers (n = 16) and policymakers (n = 15). A total 23 articles reported stakeholders' perspectives, from which 291 quotes were extracted. Thematic synthesis identified 12 initial codes, which were summarized into three themes: perinatal depression screening practices, challenges in implementing screening, facilitating factors and opportunities for screening services.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified 17 types of stakeholders, with health care workers and perinatal women being the primary groups. Additionally, key challenges in perinatal depression screening were identified, highlighting the need for future research to focus cost, quality, and reimbursement structures to ensure the sustainable and scalable implementation of screening initiatives.

摘要

相似文献

1
Stakeholders and their perspectives on perinatal depression screening: a systematic review.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2024 Nov-Dec;91:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Gaps between current practice in perinatal depression screening and guideline recommendations: a systematic review.目前围产期抑郁症筛查实践与指南建议之间的差距:系统评价。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2024 Jul-Aug;89:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.04.011. Epub 2024 May 4.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
9
Approaches to health-care provider education and professional development in perinatal depression: a systematic review.围产期抑郁症中医疗保健提供者教育与专业发展的方法:一项系统综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 24;17(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1431-4.
10
Group cognitive behavioural therapy for postnatal depression: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses.产后抑郁的团体认知行为疗法:临床有效性、成本效益和信息价值分析的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Sep;14(44):1-107, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14440.