Suppr超能文献

质量改进措施:使用 STOP-BANG 评分和监测以降低住院的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停高危患者的不良事件发生率。

Quality improvement initiative: use of the STOP-BANG score and monitoring to reduce adverse events in hospitalised patients at risk of obstructive sleep apnoea.

机构信息

Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Nov 27;13(4):e002968. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002968.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnoea increases risk of respiratory depression with administration of sedatives, narcotics or anxiolytics. To reduce adverse events during hospital admission, we implemented STOP-BANG screening to prompt respiratory monitoring for inpatients receiving these medications. This study reports on protocol development, implementation and an initial analysis over 5 years to evaluate implementation success and outcomes.

INTERVENTION

The STOP-BANG measure was embedded in the nurse navigator at admission. If the score was ≥3 and sedatives, narcotics and/or anxiolytics were ordered, the provider was prompted to monitor patients with continuous pulse oximetry and/or capnography.

METHODS

We assessed the impact of the intervention using a retrospective pre-post design. Preprotocol data from all adult inpatients over a 2.5-year period, and postprotocol data from all adult inpatients from over a 5-year period, were extracted from the electronic health record. Outcomes included use of monitoring; adverse events during hospitalisation were included to evaluate the effects of the intervention: mortality, rate of rapid response team events, reversal and/or rescue, intensive care unit admission and orders for positive airway pressure equipment.

RESULTS

The combined preprotocol and postprotocol sample included 254 121 patients. After protocol implementation, overall mortality for patients receiving sedatives, narcotics or anxiolytics decreased slightly from 2.1% to 1.9% (p<0.001). In the postprotocol cohort only (n=193 744), monitored patients had a higher probability of experiencing all adverse events. Among monitored patients, mortality was lowest in the high-risk group (STOP-BANG≥5).

DISCUSSION

Triaging by STOP-BANG coupled with monitoring appeared to be helpful for patients at highest risk of obstructive sleep apnoea. Given the complexity of obstructive sleep apnoea, further pursuit of subphenotypes is warranted.

摘要

背景

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停会增加镇静剂、麻醉剂或抗焦虑药给药后呼吸抑制的风险。为了减少住院期间的不良事件,我们实施了 STOP-BANG 筛查,以提示接受这些药物治疗的住院患者进行呼吸监测。本研究报告了该方案在 5 年内的制定、实施和初步分析结果,以评估实施的成功和结果。

干预措施

STOP-BANG 量表在入院时嵌入护士导航员中。如果得分≥3,且开了镇静剂、麻醉剂和/或抗焦虑药,系统会提示医生对患者进行连续脉搏血氧饱和度和/或呼气末二氧化碳监测。

方法

我们使用回顾性前后设计评估了干预措施的影响。从电子病历中提取了 2.5 年期间所有成年住院患者的方案前数据,以及 5 年期间所有成年住院患者的方案后数据。结果包括监测的使用情况;还纳入了住院期间的不良事件,以评估干预措施的效果:死亡率、快速反应团队事件的发生率、逆转和/或抢救、重症监护病房的入院率和正压通气设备的医嘱。

结果

综合方案前和方案后样本包括 254121 名患者。在实施方案后,接受镇静剂、麻醉剂或抗焦虑药治疗的患者的总体死亡率从 2.1%略有下降至 1.9%(p<0.001)。仅在方案后队列中(n=193744),接受监测的患者发生所有不良事件的可能性更高。在接受监测的患者中,高危组(STOP-BANG≥5)的死亡率最低。

讨论

通过 STOP-BANG 进行分诊,加上监测,似乎对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停风险最高的患者有帮助。鉴于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的复杂性,进一步研究亚表型是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be8f/11603732/fc6318bc1ce2/bmjoq-13-4-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验