Pivetta Bianca, Chen Lina, Nagappa Mahesh, Saripella Aparna, Waseem Rida, Englesakis Marina, Chung Frances
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211009. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1009.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent global health concern and is associated with many adverse outcomes for patients.
To evaluate the utility of the STOP-Bang (snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, blood pressure, body mass index, age, neck size, gender) questionnaire in the sleep clinic setting to screen for and stratify the risk of OSA among populations from different geographical regions.
MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-process, Embase, EmCare Nursing, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, Journals@Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2008 to March 2020. This was done to identify studies that used the STOP-Bang questionnaire and polysomnography testing in adults referred to sleep clinics.
Clinical and demographic data were extracted from each article independently by 2 reviewers. The combined test characteristics were calculated using 2 × 2 contingency tables. Random-effects meta-analyses and metaregression with sensitivity analyses were performed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed.
The combined test characteristics and area under summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to compare STOP-Bang questionnaire accuracy with polysomnography testing.
A total of 47 studies with 26 547 participants (mean [SD] age, 50 [5] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 32 [3]; 16 780 [65%] men) met the criteria for the systematic review. Studies were organized in different geographic regional groups: North America, South America, Europe, Middle East, East Asia, and South or Southeast Asia. The prevalence rates for all OSA, moderate to severe OSA, and severe OSA were 80% (95% CI, 80%-81%), 58% (95% CI, 58%-59%), and 39% (95% CI, 38%-39%), respectively. A STOP-Bang score of at least 3 had excellent sensitivity (>90%) and high discriminative power to exclude moderate to severe and severe OSA, with negative predictive values of 77% (95% CI, 75%-78%) and 91% (95% CI, 90%-92%), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of a STOP-Bang score of at least 3 to detect moderate to severe OSA was high (>0.80) in all regions except East Asia (0.52; 95% CI, 0.48-0.56).
The results of this meta-analysis suggest that the STOP-Bang questionnaire can be used as a screening tool to assist in triaging patients with suspected OSA referred to sleep clinics in different global regions.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一个全球高度普遍的健康问题,与患者的许多不良后果相关。
评估STOP-Bang问卷(打鼾、疲劳、观察到的呼吸暂停、血压、体重指数、年龄、颈围、性别)在睡眠诊所环境中对不同地理区域人群进行OSA风险筛查和分层的效用。
对MEDLINE、MEDLINE在研数据库、Embase、EmCare Nursing、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、PsycINFO、Ovid期刊数据库、Web of Science、Scopus和CINAHL电子数据库进行了系统检索,检索时间为2008年1月至2020年3月。目的是识别在转至睡眠诊所的成年人中使用STOP-Bang问卷和多导睡眠图测试的研究。
2名评审员分别从每篇文章中提取临床和人口统计学数据。使用2×2列联表计算联合检验特征。进行随机效应荟萃分析和带有敏感性分析的元回归分析。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。
使用联合检验特征和汇总接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来比较STOP-Bang问卷与多导睡眠图测试的准确性。
共有47项研究,26547名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,50[5]岁;平均[标准差]体重指数,32[3];16780名[65%]男性)符合系统评价的标准。研究被分为不同的地理区域组:北美、南美、欧洲、中东、东亚以及南亚或东南亚。所有OSA、中度至重度OSA和重度OSA的患病率分别为80%(95%CI,80%-81%)、58%(95%CI,58%-59%)和39%(95%CI,38%-39%)。STOP-Bang评分至少为3具有出色的敏感性(>90%)和较高的鉴别能力,可排除中度至重度和重度OSA,阴性预测值分别为77%(95%CI,75%-78%)和91%(95%CI,90%-92%)。除东亚外(0.52;95%CI,0.48-0.56),所有地区中STOP-Bang评分至少为3检测中度至重度OSA的诊断准确性都很高(>0.80)。
这项荟萃分析的结果表明,STOP-Bang问卷可作为一种筛查工具,协助对转至不同全球区域睡眠诊所的疑似OSA患者进行分流。