• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

今晚谁做饭?加拿大多伦多成年伴侣的时间利用研究。

Who's cooking tonight? A time-use study of coupled adults in Toronto, Canada.

作者信息

Liu Bochu, Widener Michael J, Smith Lindsey G, Farber Steven, Gesink Dionne, Minaker Leia M, Patterson Zachary, Larsen Kristian, Gilliland Jason

机构信息

Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto-St George, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Human Geography, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Time Soc. 2022 Nov;31(4):480-507. doi: 10.1177/0961463X221100696. Epub 2022 May 21.

DOI:10.1177/0961463X221100696
PMID:36339032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9630964/
Abstract

Understanding how coupled adults arrange food-related labor in relation to their daily time allocation is of great importance because different arrangements may have implications for diet-related health and gender equity. Studies from the time-use perspective argue that daily activities such as work, caregiving, and non-food-related housework can potentially compete for time with foodwork. However, studies in this regard are mostly centered on individual-level analyses. They fail to consider cohabiting partners' time spent on foodwork and non-food-related activities, a factor that could be helpful in explaining how coupled partners decide to allocate time to food activities. Using 108 daily time-use logs from seventeen opposite-gender couples living in Toronto, Canada, this paper examines how male and female partners' time spent on non-food-related activities impact the total amount of time spent on foodwork by coupled adults and the difference in time spent on foodwork between coupled women and men. Results show that both male and female partners took a higher portion of foodwork when their partner worked longer. When men worked for additional time, the couple-level duration of foodwork decreased. Without a significant impact on the gender difference in foodwork duration, women's increased caregiving duration was associated with a reduction of total time spent on foodwork by couples. An increase in caregiving and non-food-related chores by men was associated with an increased difference in duration of foodwork between women and men, which helped secure a constant total amount of foodwork at the couple level. These behavioral variations between men and women demonstrate the gender differences in one's responsiveness to the change of partners' non-food-related tasks. The associations found among non-food-related activities and foodwork are suggestive of a need to account for partners' time allocation when studying the time-use dynamics of foodwork and other daily activities.

摘要

了解成年伴侣如何根据日常时间分配来安排与食物相关的劳动非常重要,因为不同的安排可能会对与饮食相关的健康和性别平等产生影响。从时间利用角度进行的研究认为,工作、照料和与食物无关的家务等日常活动可能会与食物工作争夺时间。然而,这方面的研究大多集中在个体层面的分析上。它们没有考虑同居伴侣在食物工作和与食物无关的活动上所花费的时间,而这一因素有助于解释伴侣如何决定分配时间用于食物活动。本文使用来自加拿大多伦多的17对异性伴侣的108份日常时间使用记录,研究了男性和女性伴侣在与食物无关的活动上所花费的时间如何影响成年伴侣在食物工作上花费的总时间,以及伴侣中女性和男性在食物工作上花费时间的差异。结果表明,当伴侣工作时间更长时,男性和女性伴侣承担的食物工作比例都更高。当男性加班时,伴侣层面的食物工作时长会减少。女性照料时长的增加与伴侣在食物工作上花费的总时间减少有关,但对食物工作时长的性别差异没有显著影响。男性照料和与食物无关的家务增加与女性和男性在食物工作时长上的差异增大有关,这有助于在伴侣层面确保食物工作的总时长保持不变。男女之间的这些行为差异表明了在应对伴侣与食物无关任务变化时的性别差异。在与食物无关的活动和食物工作之间发现的关联表明,在研究食物工作和其他日常活动的时间利用动态时,需要考虑伴侣的时间分配情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d2/9630964/e7061431b51e/10.1177_0961463X221100696-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d2/9630964/666dbfc31df8/10.1177_0961463X221100696-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d2/9630964/e7061431b51e/10.1177_0961463X221100696-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d2/9630964/666dbfc31df8/10.1177_0961463X221100696-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94d2/9630964/e7061431b51e/10.1177_0961463X221100696-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Who's cooking tonight? A time-use study of coupled adults in Toronto, Canada.今晚谁做饭?加拿大多伦多成年伴侣的时间利用研究。
Time Soc. 2022 Nov;31(4):480-507. doi: 10.1177/0961463X221100696. Epub 2022 May 21.
2
How Does Time Use Differ between Individuals Who Do More versus Less Foodwork? A Compositional Data Analysis of Time Use in the United Kingdom Time Use Survey 2014-2015.多做家务和少做家务的人在时间利用上有何不同?基于 2014-2015 年英国时间利用调查的时间利用构成数据分析。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 30;12(8):2280. doi: 10.3390/nu12082280.
3
Foodwork in the United Kingdom from 1983 to 2014: A compositional data analysis of repeat cross-sectional time use surveys.英国 1983 年至 2014 年的食物工作:重复横断面时间使用调查的成分数据分析。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105694. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105694. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
4
Examining foodwork and eating behaviors among heterosexual and gay male couples.研究异性恋和男同性恋伴侣之间的饮食工作和饮食行为。
Appetite. 2022 May 1;172:105953. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105953. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Women's and men's work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19.新冠疫情之前及期间的女性和男性工作、家务劳动与儿童照料
Rev Econ Househ. 2020;18(4):1001-1017. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09502-1. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
6
Determinants and impact of role-related time use allocation on self-reported health among married men and women: a cross-national comparative study.已婚男性和女性中与角色相关的时间使用分配对自我报告健康的影响因素及作用:一项跨国比较研究
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):1204. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09306-z.
7
Constrained choices? Linking employees' and spouses' work time to health behaviors.受限选择?将员工及其配偶的工作时间与健康行为联系起来。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;126:99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.015. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
8
Parenthood and the gender division of labour across the income distribution:: the relative importance of relative earnings.收入分配中的父母身份与性别分工:相对收入的相对重要性
Eur Sociol Rev. 2023 Apr;39(2):229-246. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcac036. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
9
How men receive and utilise partner support when trying to change their diet and physical activity within a men's weight management programme.男性在参与男性体重管理计划中改变饮食和增加身体活动时,如何接受和利用伴侣的支持。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8213-z.
10
Difficult decisions: Evaluating individual and couple-level fertility intentions and HIV acquisition among HIV serodiscordant couples in Zambia.艰难抉择:评估赞比亚HIV血清学不一致夫妇的个人及夫妻层面生育意愿与HIV感染情况
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0189869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189869. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Acceptability: The Role of Understanding Participant, Neighborhood, and Community Contextual Factors in Designing a Community-Tailored Cooking Intervention.评估可接受性:在设计社区定制烹饪干预措施时,了解参与者、社区和社区背景因素的作用。
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 5;16(3):463. doi: 10.3390/nu16030463.

本文引用的文献

1
An exploration of how meal preparation activities relate to self-rated time pressure, stress, and health in Canada: A time use approach.加拿大膳食准备活动与自评时间压力、压力和健康之间关系的探索:一种时间使用方法。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 May 21;15:100818. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100818. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
How Does Time Use Differ between Individuals Who Do More versus Less Foodwork? A Compositional Data Analysis of Time Use in the United Kingdom Time Use Survey 2014-2015.多做家务和少做家务的人在时间利用上有何不同?基于 2014-2015 年英国时间利用调查的时间利用构成数据分析。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 30;12(8):2280. doi: 10.3390/nu12082280.
3
Social Change and the Gendered Division of Household Labor in Canada.
加拿大的社会变革与家务劳动的性别分工
Can Rev Sociol. 2019 May;56(2):178-203. doi: 10.1111/cars.12242. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
Who's cooking? Trends in US home food preparation by gender, education, and race/ethnicity from 2003 to 2016.谁在做饭?2003 年至 2016 年美国按性别、教育程度和种族/族裔划分的家庭食品准备趋势。
Nutr J. 2018 Apr 2;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0347-9.
5
Health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: A systematic review of observational studies.家庭烹饪的健康与社会决定因素及结果:观察性研究的系统评价
Appetite. 2017 Apr 1;111:116-134. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
6
Your money or your time? How both types of scarcity matter to physical activity and healthy eating.要钱还是要时间?两种形式的稀缺对体育活动和健康饮食都至关重要。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jan;172:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
7
Lesbian women and household labor division: A systematic review of scholarly research from 2000 to 2015.女同性恋者与家务分工:对2000年至2015年学术研究的系统综述
J Lesbian Stud. 2017 Jan 2;21(1):47-69. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2016.1142350. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
8
Is cooking at home associated with better diet quality or weight-loss intention?在家做饭与更好的饮食质量或减肥意愿有关吗?
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Jun;18(8):1397-406. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001943. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
9
Prevalence and patterns of cooking dinner at home in the USA: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008.美国在家做晚餐的流行情况及模式:2007 - 2008年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)
Public Health Nutr. 2014 May;17(5):1022-30. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002589. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
10
The end of the gender revolution? Gender role attitudes from 1977 to 2008.性别革命的终结?1977 年至 2008 年的性别角色态度。
AJS. 2011 Jul;117(1):259-89. doi: 10.1086/658853.